Excellent workout tool
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 10! out of 10
Created: May 4, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I like this thing quite a lot. I've had it for about three weeks, and have used it on 12 workouts so far. I use it primarily for running, with biking a secondary usage. The main reason I wanted it was for the instantaneous readout of distance, running pace and heart rate, the latter needed for the speed work I want to do this running season.
The core functionality (distance and heart rate monitoring) works perfectly. There's none of the signal drops I've had with other heart monitors. Once the satellites are initially acquired, I've only had one dropout when I was outside. The initial acquisition of the satellites can be quirky and can take some time. The accuracy (according to the readout) is +/- 25ft, depending on how many satellites can be found. I've compared the distance measurement on the GPS with a known, measured distance on one of the trails I run on (the Chicago lakefront path). The GPS always increments a mile when I'm within 5 or 10 feet of the mile marker sign on the path. Well, I guess that's the least I should expect from a $350 GPS unit! Of course it's bigger than a normal running stopwatch, but that hasn't bothered me at all. The heart rate strap is also very comfortable and well-designed.
The display is crisp and has one outstanding feature: The information presented on the various pages can be completely user-customized. The default screen layout is rather poor, but in just a few steps I could replace it with the information I wanted to see while I run. There are almost 40 different data fields you can choose from for display. Examples: current pace, average lap pace, average run pace, heartrate, distance.
The only disappointment is the point-in-time (instantaneous) pace measurement: It varies wildly during a run. I see swings as big as +/- 3 minutes/mile. I'm a marathoner and I know my pace is fairly consistent during a run. I just looked at my run today, and according to the data the first mile varied from 5:57/mile to 12:06 mile. I suspect the problem is either in the averaging algorithm (too short a distance?), or in the uncertainty that results from different satellites coming in and out of view. The variations seem to get worse under tree cover compared with an open area. Luckily there's a lap-average pace that can be presented, and at least that value is useful and more accurate. The bottom line is that you can't look at the watch and say "right now I'm running 9 mins/mile". There is the ability to specify a pace smoothing factor, but I have it maxed out and still see the variations. The elevation readout also seems inaccurate, but that isn't important to me.
Upload of workout data to the PC software (Training Center) is transparent. The PC software is very good for presenting time/distance/pace/heartrate/calorie data. However the maps it shows are very crude. I've worked a bit with one of the online, subscription services (MotionBased). That looks really good and provides some additional functionality beyond the included Training Center software, although I still haven't decided if it's worth the $$$ yet for long-term data storage. MotionBased allows export to Google Earth, and it's tremendously cool to see your running path superimposed on a satellite image. You can recharge the unit through the USB port on your computer, although it's slower than using the dedicated recharger.
I had hoped that owning this device would prove motivational for me, and indeed it has. I can't imagine running or biking without it. Updating my training log is trivial now: Plug this thing into my computer, and it's done. My hope is that a future software update will do something about the pace calculation (maybe a few additional levels of smoothing?). If so, the Forerunner 305 would earn 5 stars+++.
Positives:
Flawless heart rate sampling
Great distance measuring and lap-average pace calculation
Seamless integration with a PC
Fully-automatic training log update
User-customizable display
Negatives;
Wildly-varying pace readout.
An Improvement
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 9.4 out of 10
Created: Apr 19, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
This is a definite improvement over the 301. I had several complaints with the 301:
(1) The heart rate monitor did not track well, and would often jump up to 240, which was a problem when looking at average heart rate later;
(2) The tracking was bad sometimes in the woods, where I run (it could vary half a mile on a four-mile course, and even worse, the elevation could spike 1,200 feet at times and completely change the profile of the run);
(3) The unit was not ergonomic, the buttons were difficult to push, and the screen was hard to see; and
(4) It took forever to acquire the satellites.
The heart rate monitor comes with a new sensor that is more flexible, comfortable, and offers more reliable data. The tracking is much better and more consistent. The unit is much more like a watch, the display is great, and the buttons are much easier to push while on the go. However, it still takes a while to acquire the satellite signal. It is a bit improved, and is not dissimilar from other Garmin products, so I'd have to say that it's OK.
The BIGGEST improvement is that this model is more like a typical GPS in that it offers many different modes and screens to track various types of information (one can toggle between three different screens). For example, on one screen, I have the current time, sunrise, sunset, and running time. On another screen I have the grade, altitude, average pace, and current pace. On yet another screen I have heart rate, calories, distance traveled, and heading. It is totally cool.
I use this thing for running, biking, rollerblading, mountaineering, skiing, and just about everything else outside. I am really happy that I spent the money for the upgraded version.
Pretty Nice, some room for improvement
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 8.3 out of 10
Created: Apr 20, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I have had my Forerunner 305 for almost 3 weeks now. Previous to this I used a Polar S150 (wired bike mount) for several years and a entry level Polar before that, so I am used to basic heart rate monitor but not advance data recording or GPS.
I have tested the Forerunner 305 running, biking and swimming and have been generally very impressed.
General: The concept of acquiring satellites before I get going took a little getting used to. After the first couple of times I generally get satellite acquisition within about 30 seconds as long as I am outside or in my enclosed front porch. I set the unit down so that it is completely stationary while acquiring satellites. I get spotty to no reception indoors. The heart rate monitor functions well in comparison to my Polars. I have only had erratic heart readings at the end of one bike ride (fixed by adjusting the strap), which is better performance than I generally would get with the Polars (Except for Swimming, see below). The grade measurements are so erratic as to be totally useless. I have had the grade measurement vary from 8% to 25% back down to 5% within one minute of sustained climbing on the bike. I believe this is due to a poor averaging algorithm (2 point average as opposed to smoother averages involving more points). This is something I intended to test once I figure out how to access the raw data. Data recording is interesting, but is highly dependent on the software used to analyze it. Training center software is decent but unsophisticated (lack of user configurable option is disappointing in a $300+ product). Motion Based has been fun to use, especially the map player. As noted in a previous post of mine errors in distance calculations arise due to Motion Based insistence on connecting erratic track points recorded when you are standing still.
Running: To this point I have done about half a dozen runs of 3-3.5 miles each on a couple of different courses. Mostly I run on trails with trees (no real leaves as of yet) with some street and open field running mixed in. Generally in the trees I average an accuracy of about 25 ft, which I consider to be pretty good. The tracks and distances are both reproducible to within this approximate 25 ft range. I have found the "instantaneous" pace to be somewhat erratic but generally within approximately 5% of the short term mean. The auto stop feature (I have it set to stop if pace falls below 30 min mile) working decently on the run but occasionally does not register that I am stopped. Overall I am very excited to easily track my running distance and have a pretty good idea of my pace.
Biking: Used for approximately 10 bike rides both on and off road. Despite some concerns that the antenna faces the wrong way when mounted on the handlebars (I mount mine by wrapping the monitor around a piece of foam) I generally get great GPS reception on the bike. Accuracy is generally about 15 ft on open road and 25-30 ft.on trails. The speed and distance seems to be very accurate and the precision (reproducibility) is within 1%. The auto stop feature works extremely well on the bike, starting and stopping the unit within 1 second. The one down side is that the buttons you are most likely to use for cycling are on the side of the unit (the up/down and occasionally the mode button).
Swimming: I have only tested in an indoor swimming pool, hoping to be able to record my heart rate. Unfortunately, unlike my Polar S150 the heart rate signal cannot be measured in the water. I did these tests with the receiver under my swim cap, which was pretty comfortable and I could access the buttons easily. There may be more utility for swimming in open water.
Amazing
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 6.5 out of 10
Created: Jun 26, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I bought this product with some trepidation, after reading the mixed reviews on Amazon.com, so I made sure that my supplier had a good return policy. However, I have to say that it is an amazing piece of equipment, and kudos to the people that developed it. Sure it has some kinks that I am prepared to put up with, bearing in mind that this technology is in its infancy (especially at this size). I am training for my first marathon and I have found the forerunner to be great for logging and keeping track of my runs and my overall progress. Sure the real-time pace is not hugely accurate, but I feel very confident that it keeps very good track of my distances and overall pace for each of my runs (if I do an out-and-back run, the plotted course and calculated distances are very close). As I do most of my weekday running in boring suburban DC neighborhoods, it is liberating that I don't have to do the same measured route every time to keep track of my pace. I can wander at will, and head towards home when I am getting close to my desired number of miles. The virtual running partner is a great motivator. How else can you get a running partner to start the run at the same time and place as you and to run at a constant pre-set pace? It was a little annoying when I was ahead of him/her and needed to wait to cross the road; meanwhile I watched him/her passing me out!! I tried the auto-stop function for the first time this weekend, it worked ok, but did have some kinks...maybe it was because of very heavy rain and lightening we were having. The heart rate monitor seems to work fine. I have found signal strength to be no problem (I live in DC area, not sure it that makes any difference). My neighborhood has plenty of trees and the parks that I run in are heavily forested (its summer here). As I drove into the park this weekend during the storm my satellite radio kept losing signal under the (very wet) tree cover, but the forerunner seemed to work fine (except for the autostop). I wish their maps were more detailed, they just have the major streets, I guess Garmin chose to provide a stripped down version.....they should have done a better job there. Overall, as a technophile, I love this piece of equipment, and look forward to seeing how they improve it in the future. You do need to understand the limitations of this device though (e.g. somewhat accurate real-time pace information, undercounting overly twisty routes). I guess I am lucky that I have had no problems with it so far (it has only been a month), but I will update this if I need to call their customer service.
Great - when it actually works, HORRIBLE customer support
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 6.4 out of 10
Created: Jun 9, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I got my first Garmin 305 about 2 months ago. The first day I got it the Enter button stopped working. I returned the Garmin 305 to the dealer and was quickly shipped a new one. I am currently using the second Garmin, however the heart rate monitor function on the watch stopped working about 2 weeks ago. I contacted customer support and they said they would ship me a new one, however they only shipped a new chest monitor instead of the watch. Needless to say I still have the problem. Calling customer service is EXTREMELY painful. The wait time is 30-35 minutes just to talk to someone. I have tried to call morning and afternoons and it does not change the wait time. (I am actually on hold right now as I type and am going on 25 minutes.) I should have known not to give my old Polar to my wife.
The 305 functionality, when it works, is very cool. Mine locks in on satellites within 1-2 minutes and does a good job measuring average pace per lap. I love the auto lap function which I have set at 1 mile. The instant pace is off due to the delay in tracking with the satellites. It is actually showing my pace delayed about 10-15 seconds. I have gone to just using the average lap pace and it gives me what I really need to know. The only problem I have besides the heart rate not working at all, is the distance tracking on one particular trail I run. The trail has a lot of tight switchbacks and the area is covered with trees. The distance registers about 1.5 miles short on a 12 mile loop. It does work well everywhere else I run.
New update: I finally got through to customer support and they are making me send my watch in for service. Maybe I'll enjoy just running with no data for a while, yeah right!
All I hoped for!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 5.8 out of 10
Created: Aug 29, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
With a few one-star reviews, I was a bit hesitant to order this. Now, after two weeks of use (10 runs of 2 to 2.5 miles each), I have no regrets with the purchase whatsoever.
I haven't had any of the problems reported by any of the one-star reviewers. It syncs to the satellite in a reasonable* amount of time, seems to track my pace very well, tracks distance well, and the heart rate monitor seems WAY more accurate than the dedicated exercise machines at my local gym.
*by reasonable, it does take a minute or two to sync to the satellites each time. That's the only thing I could possibly think of improving, but it's not a big deal. Being the super-impatient person I am, I often turn on the watch, set it on my front porch, go back in and change into my running outfit, and by the time I come back out it's ready to go.
I haven't seen the pacing issues others have reported. I'm a beginning runner... but if I keep a solid pace... it reports about 10mins/mile... if I push a little harder... about 9mins/mile... if I let up... about 11mins/mile. It seems very consistent over my entire 2-2.5 mile run.
I have a 2.1 mile run where I've done the same exact route about 6 times... and when I compare the maps of each run... they overlap almost exactly.
I have thyroid and heart issues, and this watch gives me the confidence to know I'm not exceeding my max hr for too long (I can easily get into the 180's) and gives me the feedback and stats to keep me motivated.
Last but not least, I've bought dozens and dozens of items from Amazon over the years, and this is the first review I've taken the time to write - hope that gives you an indication of how happy I am with this product. ;-)
Logged over 400 miles running on G305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 5.6 out of 10
Created: May 9, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I upgraded from my old timex to a 301 unit. Then to the 305. I run with 4 other marathoners who use the 301. Overall they are pleased with the units. This weekend I ran a marathon up in Ogden, UT. At mile 21 my unit froze up and never regained signal. Even after finishing the race. I upgraded to the most recent software using the garmin web update prior to the race & full charged unit. Here is my experience of the G305.
(Unit fully charged before long runs)
Pros
-Consistent heart rate over the 301 unit
-No elevation spikes like the 301 unit
-Motion Based software works great
Cons
-Signal dropped on three long runs different locations
Note: Other runners w/ 301 did not drop signal
-Takes a long time to get signal
-Unconfortable compared to 301 unit on wrist
After the unit freezing up during a marathon I'm going to return it and buy the G301 again for $200 less than the G305. In my opinion the signal does not work better than older garmin units. When my unit drops signal my friends w/ the 301 just laugh and say how much did you pay for the unit... Do you homework before paying $350 for this unit.
Good luck!
EVERYTHING EXCELENT EXCEPTS CALORIES CALCULATOR
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 5.6 out of 10
Created: Jun 2, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
This unit is the perfect tool for training. I have used it for about 4 weeks and everything works fine, except the calories calculator. In a 10 km. run (time 57 minutes)it showed that I burned 2.366 calories which is imposible. After checked all the user profile data and other items the unit still presents the same problem. I contacted Technical Support from Garmin and they confirmed me that there is problems with the calculation of the burned calories. They explain that the variation in the altitud of the run has something to do with the problem and that they are working to fix it. I hope that they can solve it soon so the Forerunner 305 become in a 100% sucessfull training device.
Garmin Forerunner 305 Wrist-Mounted GPS Personal Training Device
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 5.1 out of 10
Created: Aug 25, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin 305 is a vast improvement over my Garmin 301 and 201. The heart rate monitor really does work unlike my 301 that failed with in a month or two. I am a avid trail runner. Most of my training runs involve canyons and forested areas. I have yet to loose a signal during my runs. I recently completed the Pike's Peak Ascent using my Garmin 305 and noticed that I still ended up with issues dealing with the switch backs. The Garmin was .38 tenths off for the total distance, not to bad for the number of switch back. As for the heart rate monitor, it works well and is confortable, but due to my poor experience with the heart rate monitor on the Garmin 301 my vote is still out on it's long term use.
Wow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 4.8 out of 10
Created: Apr 18, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
It just came today, and of course it suddenly became time to go for a run. It's simple, works as advertised, and had no trouble picking up a signal in the urban canyon of Chicago before I hit the lake. Once home, uploading the data to MotionBased.com was quick. And it logs everything, with maps (including export to Google Earth), times, heart rate, etc. All presented in slick digestible graphs and charts. Tres cool. Actually useful. I picked it up so I could train _right_ for the marathon this year. All in all, I'm extremely happy with this gizmo, which I think will provide the birds eye view of a multi-month training plan I've been looking for.
Oh, and MotionBased.com provides mac support! Take that Garmin. Garmin will supposedly offer a mac version of their software later this year, but I don't see myself using it given what MotionBased has to offer.
Good product, but could be better
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 4.6 out of 10
Created: Oct 30, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought the 305 to help maintain pace while training for a marathon. My thoughts:
br /
br /GPS RECEPTION: I have had no problems. Only once did it take more than a minute or two to find the signal. It also keeps signal on trails through the woods that I like to run.
br /
br /BATTERY LIFE: Could be better. I put the 305 on the charger whenever not in use to avoid a dead battery minutes into a run. The first time I used it, I got only about 2 1/2 hrs of total life (2 1/2 separate runs). It has a battery life indicator, but it does not show one on the page that I usually view (pace / distance / time).
br /
br /COMFORT: I do not have huge wrists and the 305 is not the most comfortable watch. I find it more comfortable if I loosen it up just a bit and push it further up my arm than where I would wear a typical watch. The 405 looks more comfortable, but for the cost and potential other draw backs I chose the 305. Still glad I did.
br /
br /ACCURACY: Appears to be fine. It seems to agree pretty well with my Garmin Oregon 400. I have not done the "to the foot" testing that other GPS reviewers do.
br /
br /NEGATIVES: Battery life, comfort, not waterproof (I would love to wear this in triathlons).
br /
br /PROS: Reception in woods, stores your workouts, MUCH better than any of those "foot pod" gadgets (I tried the NIKE+ Ipod thing - don't waste your money), keeps me on pace!
br /
br /PURCHASE AGAIN: Yes.
Generally Good product
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 4.6 out of 10
Created: Aug 10, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I use the 305 specifically for running. Distance and pace are very accurate, which is mostly what I'm interested in. Elevation doesn't appear to be close at all, unless you consider a +-200 feet over a 150 ft elevation shift reasonable (I don't). I wish this were better, as I have a heavy hill climb on my next race, I want to train on similar elevation shift and have good feedback from my GPS. Aquire time doesn't appear to be any different compared to my forerunner 201 that I previously used.
For the $200 delta between a 305 and a 205, I'd probably purchase the 205 and save the money. I'm hoping reliability of the 305 is better than the 200 series though... My 201 stopped working after about 15 months of use. Looks like maybe some water/sweat got inside and killed the IC's.
Finally, the software that comes packaged with 305 is mediocre at best. It's especially irritating that you can't scale the y-axis on the pace/hr/time/ plots.
All complaints aside, I wouldn't go without my GPS. It's a great training aid and I'd recommend it. (Still if you can find a 205 for ~$150 or so, I think that's the way to go).
Garmin Forerunner 305 Wrist-Mounted GPS
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 4.4 out of 10
Created: Aug 12, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
The unit took a couple of workout sessions to get it set up the way I wanted it. Now that I have it set up properly it has worked flawlessly. One time I rushed it and did not allow it to complete its satelite search before starting and had to stop and turn it off/on before it could locate our my position. It's distance accuracy has been consistently within .01 hundredth of a mile. The pace tends to fluctuate at times. I believe this is due to signal interference.
Accurately tracks my pace, easy to use
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 4.4 out of 10
Created: Nov 3, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The forerunner 305 gives exactly what I expected: an easy to use device that accurately tracks my pace and heart rate. I definitely recommend this product. My runs/usage are in neighborhood areas with only occasional tree coverage.
br /
br /As for the accessory bike attachment (sold separately), I almost bought that until I read the reviews that the quick release sometimes inadvertently released. I wouldn't want to accidentally loose this expensive piece of gear, so I didn't get it.
br /
br /Pluses:
br /- Easy to use
br /- Accurate
br /- Customizable data screens
br /- HR monitoring
br /- Easy to use tracking software for analyzing your workouts afterwards
br /- Easy to program "advanced" workouts on the computer and upload to unit
br /
br /Minuses:
br /- Elevation data jumps up and down a lot and doesn't appear to have short duration accuracy, maybe just the overall trend is accurate
br /- Plotting software does not have an option for changing the scaling of the Y-axis, so sometimes your data is cluttered, and it's hard to see the resolution
br /- Watchband : some people don't like it (rubberized plastic), but doesn't bother me much
br /
Advanced workout tracking
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 4.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 31, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have used this watch for everything. 14'ers, triathlons, adventure races, canyoneering, basically anything that can get the heart rate up and a nice sweat.
br /
br /first, the watch unit is big. I am over 6'2" and 180 lbs, and the watch is big on my wrist. however, after 1 or 2 weeks i have gotten used to its size. I have taken it on long runs and long rides (12+ hours) and of course it gets annoying, but everything does after that amount of time exercising. the rubber does generate and trap a bit more sweat, but its better than a cloth band that just soaks it up.
br /
br /the gps is highly accurate, i have compared it against several other units i have. I also have worn and used the polar s-625x, and the garmin unit is very accurate. i much prefer the complete cloth and clasp mechanism of the polar, but not enough to reduce usage of the garmin.
br /
br /the watch is fairly rugged and water resistant, i have had it (often!!) completely underwater when kayaking and canyoneering, and it has not leaked or been destroyed for it. despite abusing this thing fairly regularly, it has continued to work day after day.
br /
br /the downsides to this watch are few: it has to be recharged daily, or at least twice weekly if you workout more than 20 hours a week. it takes up to 3 minutes (average of 1.5) to get a signal unless you turn it on before putting it on and let it sit and gather signals for a minute. moving even slightly (scratching your head) will make you wait for the signal to catch up. the previously mentioned bulk is only an issue if you are very small, like my wife, or if you are worried about wind resistance when in the aero position in a tri. also, the software really does leave much to be desired, but it does not detract from the overall use of the watch as an HRM and distance tracking mechanism. (don't get lost in the woods during an adventure race and expect it to guide you faithfully back!)
br /
br /overall, excellent product, well worth the money if you are an exercise fiend.
Size does matter
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 4.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I was torn between the 305 and 405, particularly since the functionality seems to be about the same. What made the difference for me was actually going to the store and trying each one on. I am a female with very small wrists, so I thought the 405 might be better. But when I tried them on, I was surprised to find that the 305 is a MUCH better fit. The band on the 405 consists of stiff plastic on either side of the face, while the 305 band is flexible rubber on either side of the face. The 405 was therefore more bulky, and uncomfortable just standing in the store wearing it. While the face of the 305 is larger, it is designed to wrap around the wrist and seems less bulky. Yes, the 305 looks geeky, but so does the 405 if you're a small person. (I found that Amazon's prices were much cheaper, even with 1-day shipping, so even though I tried them on in-store, I ordered from Amazon).
br /
br /Update: Used the 305 for the first time today on a run in Central Park, and it worked perfectly. I chose an organized race to try it out, so I could test its accuracy against the course mileage and course clock - it matched up perfectly, and never dropped a signal in the park. After reading all the reviews re: current pace issues, I set mine to show four fields: (1) time; (2) distance; (3) current pace; (4) average pace. I did notice some erratic changes in the current pace, and it does seem to lag a few seconds, but most of the time it matched up well with the average pace (which was incredibly helpful), and did generally reflect when I was running faster or slower. It was nice to be able to compare how my "current pace" tracked against my average for the race.
br /
br /My first use of this watch also resulted in a new PR for me (by almost 40 seconds). I found it incredibly useful in staying motivated. It was great to see the faster current pace, which made me feel good and want to continue it, and it was helpful to see when I was starting to slow, so I could pick it back up. Highly recommended!
Awesome Training Device
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 4.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 28, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have had the 305 for a few months, and bought it as an upgrade to the Forerunner 201 that I used to have. It has certainly not disappointed! It tracks satellites well, locks on and stays locked on much better than the 201 ever could.
br /
br /I like the flexibility as a runner to go my own way, and not have to worry about figuring out how far or how fast I was going. All of that information is right on board with you throughout your run. It gives you the flexibility to go where you want to go and have the information about pace, time and distance without having to go back and measure the course you ran.
br /
br /I also like the ability to load the runs into the software program. It makes keeping an accurate log of your mileage a non-issue, as it is all right there when you upload it to your computer.
br /
br /In all, if you want to train using a heart rate monitor, this is the product for you. If you do not want the HRM, I would suggest the 205, which is the same unit, simply without the ability to use additional accessories. For runners and active people, this will revolutionize the way you train and track your training activitles. You will wonder how you ever did it before.
A great product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.8 out of 10
Created: Oct 21, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I'm very, very pleased with the Garmin 305. So much so, that after 3 months of use, I bought one for my wife. The biggest selling points for me are the relatively small size, and the great reception. One of my colleagues opted for a Timex model that has a GPS unit strapped to his arm with wireless to a wristwatch. He almost never uses it because of the poor reception.
One frustration with the Garmin, though, is the software they provide to analyze your workout data. The software has very limited capability and frequently makes errors in associating the type of workout. At least once a week it combines a bike workout with a run workout, even though the two workouts were on separate days and I was very careful to reset the watch. Combining the two makes it a "Multi-sport" workout and puts all the data into a separate category.
One suggestion to Garmin (besides improve their software) is to make a version that can be worn in the water. Since I dabble in triathlons, I'd love to gather data in the water, too.
Garmin Forerunner 305 a winner
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.8 out of 10
Created: Mar 18, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have loved using this since I received it. I am still finding new features to use. If you are doing intervals and/or heart rate training I would highly recommend this. I many times run in the dark so it is nice to set the alarm to beep at a certain distance and then I don't have to keep looking at the watch. At the distance I can either hit lap to see my time, or you can have it automatically record lap data at certain distances. Being female I have very small wrists and have had problems with many watches. I was worried this would be too big, and while it is large it fits very comfortably and I hardly notice it is there. The only draw back is that I can't wear it in the pool and that I won't be able to wear it in triathlons because it is not waterproof... if this one breaks I am definitely buying another.
Best athletic watch ever!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.8 out of 10
Created: Nov 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I purchased this watch at the recommendation of one of my colleagues and after I read several reviews. I was a bit concerned since I am an American living overseas. I was concerned that it would not properly track my distance. To my surprise, the watch was able to keep accurate distance even overseas. I have been using this watch for approximately 1 month, and have seen my pace times decrease weekly. I attribute my better times with being able to successfully view my pace. I have also been pleased with the bicylcling feature as well. Again, a great tool. There are so many benefits to this watch. I have only touched the tip of the iceberg. This watch is a must purchase for serious athletes. There is only one disadvantage that I have noted...the regular charging. The watch must be charged religiously every two days, if not in the midst of a workout, you may lose power.
Can't Live Without it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.8 out of 10
Created: Oct 28, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This product is so remarkable that if you are all serious in any form of training you really need one of these. The product keeps track of all your mileage, calories used etc.
br /I can tell you that the unit is well designed and has taken quite a beating in the form of falls and in shedding sweat from marathons and long runs. I've also used it when I bike as well. Keeps track of mileage, calories, speed etc. just as well as when running.
br /Reception from satellites is extremely good-- makes no difference if you are in Montreal, Orlando or San Diego - reception is quick. Only place I've had difficulty is in Miami. and after about 15 minutes, the satellites kicked in.
br /Problems with the unit are that the battery life does not live up to what it is stated for. The previous unit I owned (this is a replacement) the life went from 10 hours to less than 4 in about 18 months.
br /Had to replace what seemed to be a good unit because the software detecting satellites became corrupted and could not be updated or fixed (it still worked as a stop watch, etc, but was unable to keep information re: distance, calories, etc.).
br /Garmin's tech support in my opinion has been really good and I think you'll also have no problems with them.
br /As I said, I replaced the unit and I think there can be no greater recommendation than to buy the same product twice!
Trail Runners Beware
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Most of my hiking / running is on mountainous trails on the west coast of the US. While the 305 does a great job with street running, I rarely run on the flat, and I am very interested in tracking elevation gain / loss. Here, the 305 falls flat on its face. I ran the Grand Canyon from the rim to the Colorado and back, and according to the 305, I climbed 7 vertical miles, putting me 1.5 miles above the summit of Everest!!! I had numerous other elevation errors - in fact it never correctly calculated elevation in 12 workouts. I think the Garmin software simply integrates the elevation at each sampling point, and sums the gain / loss over the entire lap. This leads to fantastic errors as I found on numerous occasions. Also, the unit was prone to lock up mid run, resulting in very frustrating loss of the entire workout's data. The Mac software is also pretty primitive, with no topo maps. I sent it back for a refund, and now I use a (paper!) topo map and a stopwatch. Back to the dark ages!
Big John
Useful gadget to have
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Mar 25, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This review probably won't be that helpful to other. Just wanted to say I liked the product. Distance seems accurate. Haven't had any lost signal issues. Heart rate monitor also seems accurate. I like knowing how far I ran or biked without having to map out the route first.
forerunner 305 gps with hrm
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Oct 20, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
i am still learning about the 305 however, it has changed my running. i am 64 years old and have been running for 25 years. i really like knowing my current pace. its easy going out being able to run a specific time and not starting out to fast or slow. i also like being able to download my running information. the only draw back that i have found is that the heart rate indicator is so small i cannot read it while on a run.
Works Great ... Very Flexible, Easy, and Powerful
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Jun 13, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Got the watch today, set it up, plugged it in for battery charge for 1 hour then out for a 1/2 mile run. Worked perfectly, really like the way I can put the data on the watch that I want, which is time, distance, heart rate, and heart zone. Other 2 views with the down arrows show me more data such as pace. All this is customizable, wow!
Easy to use, mode button puts you into mode, up and down arrows move within mode, and enter button selects the option, easy. Only other buttons are Start/stop and Lap (for recording laps or intervals). This watch will really help me improve my cardeo and fitness. It found the sattelite instantly so I do not understand the problems that others are having.
Garmin Forerunner 305 is an Excellent Product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Mar 23, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My buddy had one of the first gen Garmin GPS training watches and I used it for XC skiing training. It was useful an accurate but bulky. The 305 has an optional training heart monitor which I use and some other things that I did not get. The 305 is like a large oversized watch. On my wrist, which is stocky, the size is ok. Might be too big if you are 110 lbs. The use of this item as a training item is excellent. It has many programs for training and will take some time to implement all of them. It is useful within minutes of initial use if you stay with biking, running, and distance, time, laps, and calorie counts.
It interfaces with computer. I have an Apple Mac and as of January 2008, interfaces with Mac in addition to PC. It is simple and requires no extra fooling around to get the program to work. The same cord is used to plug into power adapter and recharge.
This item rocks. One of the few products that I own that has absolutely no downside.
Have fun.
Exceeded Expectations
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Mar 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I delayed buying the 305 because I really wanted a GPS watch that could report cadence. I considered the Polar RS800G3, but it was more than twice the price and not as easy to use. I considered waiting for the Forerunner 405, but I was starting a new season and didn't want to change running logs mid-season. So, I bought the 305 for less than $220 and added the foot pod ($80) a week later. I planned on using the foot pod for indoor workouts. My first run with it was on the treadmill. Although the distance reported differed slightly, it was fairly close without calibration. When I downloaded the data to my computer, I was surprised that it had recorded cadence! But I pessimistically assumed that it wouldn't work when the GPS was in use. My next run was outdoors, and to my surprise the 305 recorded cadence AND GPS distance at the same time! I was even able to change the display to show cadence during my run. That's how easy it is to configure!
This watch greatly exceeded my expectations! I strongly recommend it for any serious endurance athlete!
Fantastic product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Mar 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great product.
I am training for my first half marathon and wanted something that could provide the most detailed information about my runs and my heart rate during each run. The information it provides is amazing. I recommend it highly.
MAC COMPATIBLE FINALLY!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Feb 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Garmin Training Center recentlty released the free download for MAC OS users. Great product, has completely transformed my workouts.
Much better than expected!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Dec 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
First, let me say that I am obsessive when I buy electronics. For a few days I will do research on various forums and consumer electronic sites in an effort to make sure that my hard earned money will go to the best product. Most of my research lead me to the Garmin 305, and I couldn't be happier.
br /
br /When I received my Garmin I was waiting for all the problems that some of the reviewers had; band didn't fit, battery had problems, screen was too small, and performance problems. Let me just say, after spending a few weeks with the 305, that I believe most of the bad reviews are based on the reviewers not understanding how to change or manipulate the features on the 305. Almost all of the poor reviews I have seen--minus the actual faulty machines--could have been fixed by either reading the manual or just tinkering around...even the dreaded "erratic" pace count can be smoothed out.
br /
br /The Good:
br /
br /1) Does even more than I thought it could! Whatever you want this little machine for, it will blow you away with its versatility.
br /
br /2) It is very light! I wear a stainless Submariner which is twice as heavy as the Garmin 305.
br /
br /3) The 305's GPS is accurate...extremely accurate. I have 3 courses I run on a regular basis. I know the exact length of these courses and was anxious to see if the 305 could perform. I was astonished that it was exactly right! I would have been happy with a 50-foot+ standard deviation...but it was exact!
br /
br /4) No problems with the heart rate monitor. Once again, let me state that most of the people that have problems with the heart rate monitor are probably plagued by user error.
br /
br /The Bad:
br /
br /1) I wish I could put more that 4 items on the screen. I know people have complained about not being able to see the screen, but I find it easy to read...I just want a few more items on it.
br /
br /2) Should have a color screen.
br /
br /3) I would prefer that it comes with a Velcro athletic band. I know they can smell after a few workouts but I like the convenience.
br /
br /Lastly, I have only written a few reviews on Amazon as I feel that can't make that much of a difference in a consumer's opinion...but let me say this; if you want a watch that will keep track of your location, distance, speed, heart rate etc., then you need this watch. You can't go wrong!
br /
br /
br /
br /
Great Training Tool
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Dec 6, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great training tool. I used a regular Polar for years, but this device provides you a LOT more and it's easy to use. I know it big on your wrist, but that makes it easy to read when your running or biking. It's not heavy and you'll hardly know it on your wrist. Downloading the data from your workout to your Mac is even easier.
Garmin 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Oct 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This thing is almost bullet proof...Literally! I had it on when I broke my wrist during a mountain bike ride and other than the strap blowing off it showed my speed, elevation, and pace right up to impact...and was still running afterward! I haven't had any problems the entire time I have owned it, the GPS tracking is suprisingly excellent. While riding the other day it tracked my ride through heavy tree cover and being covered by a light shirt sleeve, when I downloaded the ride that night it was like looking at a trail map of the park. The heart rate monitor works well too, haven't tried it in the gym though, and gave me the highs and lows as I rode for 7 miles. All the software works great and one of the cool features is it charges right off of a USB while your looking at your workout (less than hour charge time for me). So in my opinion you can't go wrong with this for the money, price has dropped a lot too (mine was over $300 new two years ago. Good luck hope this review helps!!
No more getting lost in the mountains!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.6 out of 10
Created: Oct 5, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Got a 305 from my wife for my 62nd birthday. I am daily mountain runner and an electrical engineer, so this is a perfect present!. First a word about some of the complaints listed by other posters:
br /
br /Setup is very easy, although there are lots of variables and preferences to set, you only do it once, and the whole idea of this thing is detailed metrics on your workout. Battery life is right at the claimed 8 hours. The heart rate monitor is excellent, and looks and works suspiciously like my Polar. I took it on many test runs in the mountains of Albuquerque while also carrying my Garmin Etrex, and the two matched very well except as noted below. Running an official 10k course, the mileage was within 1/10 mile. On very twisty runs, or urban courses where GPS can be marginal at times, the accuracy drops a bit, but not bad.
br /
br /The Trace back feature is wonderful. Even on hairpin mountain trails the strobe points the way home in very tight real time. Surprisingly the compass is not as quick and sometimes takes many seconds to swing after a turn; the Etrex is much quicker.This leads to my only two complaints
br /1) There is no MOB (man overboard) button that sets a waypoint at current position and references the compass to it on GO TO in a single stroke. It takes several button pushes to get there. This is something I do in any new location, like my hotel on a business trip, so a one button Home reference would be nice.
br /2) The Trace Back function doesn't really tell you if you totally miss a turn. The strobe points back to the correct direction for about 100 yards and then defaults to pointing at the trail end location. I'd like to hear a "wrong way dummy" alarm.
br /
br /The included software for post-run analysis is a real kick and works well. No more cheating and excuses.
br /
br /Overall, the device is great. It's a fun and useful workout tool, and a magnificent piece of engineering design.
5 stars with better HR display
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.5 out of 10
Created: Apr 25, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
A worthwhile upgrade to the 301. Much better reception (I run the trails in Colorado and have yet to drop a signal, even on cloudy days), smaller (Garmin separated the charging feature, bringing it outside the unit), doesn't pop off (the 301 would pop its hinge when my wrist would bend too far, when getting up for example), and the hr strap is more comfortable. On the downside, the hr display is now too small and is very hard to read on the run, an obvious drawback when training. The only other drawback remains the same as the 301. Garmin's training software is nowhere near as good as Polar's. Not even close. You can use third party vendors, but for the cost, the 305 should come with its own high quality software. However, I think the Garmin is superior to the Polar 625x, and better software is not nearly enough to sway me back to Polar.
Not Ready for Prime Time
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 7, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I am not Dr Mark. I signed in under my ID and for some reason it is listing this as from Dr. Mark. I don't have time to figure it out, so sorry Dr. Mark - I'm not trying to assume your moniker.
I have owned the Garmin Forerunner 305 for just over a month. I am trying to get back into shape after years of being sedentary and my trainer wanted me to get a heart rate monitor. Despite the fact that there are several good and functional monitors well under $100, as a gadget freak the Forerunner was very attractive.
First, the thing is big. I guess it has to be to fit in the electronics, but I am actually a little self concious wearing it because it is so big that it looks a little pretentious - maybe in a year when I'm buff I won't mind.
Next, the screen, despite its size, is difficult to read in both sunlight and low light. I find myself having to almost stop my activity to hold it in the exact position where I can read it. That simply isn't compatible with a good workout.
While I freely admit that I'm no rocket scientist, I am a pretty good gadget freak, and I still have to refer to the manual for some features. It is not very intuitive to navigate for me.
Lastly, the thing takes too long to acquire satellites when you start it up. When I'm ready to go - I'm ready to go. Under the best conditions I have to wait a couple of minutes for it to acquire the satellites. Since it won't let you go to other screens until the satellites are acquired, you can't set the timer, so you either wait for it - or start your activity - and then have to stop to set the timer because it is difficult to see the screen and reset it while moving. The time to acquire satellites is especially frustrating when traveling. One of the things that attracted me to the gadget was that I could "capture" the track of my outings when traveling. As a practical matter, unless I want to go to the parking lot and boot it up 10 minutes in advance, it misses the first 10 or so minutes of my outing while it acquires the satellites. Then I have to stop my activity so that I can see the screen to reset it - you get the picture.
I own a Garmin Nuvi, and love it, so I know they know how to get it right. While the idea is cool and maybe one day they will figure it out, this thing is not ready for prime time yet and I regret the purchase. I'm going to just purchase a cheap polar and throw this thing in my box of worthless gadgets to donate to a museum some day.
Love the features, hate the reliability
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I love the features on my forerunner, enough that I am very unhappy when I have to run without it. That is why it is so frustrating that it is back in the shop again, second time this year. I've only had it for eleven months.
When I called this time they asked me if I had gotten it wet. I wanted to say, um, do you know what this product is supposed to be used for? I love it, I just wished it didn't break so easily. Its not like I swim in it, or even run in the rain if I can help it. But I can't not sweat!Garmin Forefunner 305 Training Assistant
Good--but not great--training tool
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 25, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have not yet used the heart monitor part of this computer, but I have used the GPS portion for about one month--30 runs--and I can comment on its usefulness and problems.
In short, the hardware is great--5 stars--but the software to analyze the workouts on the computer is rinky-dink. The Garmin training center software does not permit you to export any data to other programs that will let you manipulate the data, such as microsoft excel.
Garmin does let you up-load the data to their web based training site, Motionbased.com, but that site tries to sell you on an expensive annual subscription for service.
Garmin would be well served by developing some more flexible and versatile software for its fantastic hardware.
Can't run without it
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Nov 10, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is my second Garmin 305. I lost the first one and couldn't stand running without my Garmin. I thought about upgrading but I was so happy with the 305 that I didn't want to take the chance of not liking another. I don't go for a run without it.
Though it was better
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 16, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought it thinking it was great, the 8th wonder on the world. Guess what?! It was not. It works great when it gets the satellite signal. The program that comes with it is not that good at all - I miss my polar pro trainer. It is big, which is good and bat at the same time, good as it allows you to see pretty fast. Bad because it's big.
br /
br /Last sunday went to run and the sun shone. I have a big white space on my wrist (ok, ok, I forgot sunscreen).
br /
br /On this same day, it went trough a couple of tunnels and it got completly lost after leaving but it recovered within 2 min.
br /
br /I'd still recommend for those who like gadgets, like me.
The Garmin 305 is an excellent tool - very recommended
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Sep 29, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I have had my 305 for a couple of months and I love it. This is the best tool I have ever used for tracking runs with heart rate, mileage, and pace statistics all right there at your finger tips. When you combine this device with the Motionbased web site (free) you really can not beat it. Yes it is expensive but for what it does it really rocks!!!
My experience is that I have no problems connecting to satellites and in fact I can even pick them up when sitting here inside my office. On two occasion since I've had the unit I have had to reboot it to get it to find the satellites but other than those two time it always connects within about 15 to 20 seconds. If fact it works so well that I've stopped sitting it on the ground and now I just leave it strapped to my arm and let it locate the satellites because it is so quick. As for keeping the GPS siginal I've had no problem. I run in the woods under trees and I have yet to lose my GPS signal and when the data is applied to the map functions in Motionbased it is spot on. It is amazing how well this thing works.
The complaint I have seen several people make about the unit not measuring altitude correctly is mostly resolved by using the Motionbased web site to correct the altitude readings. My unit is always +- 10 feet from one day to the next which is close enough for my purpose.
The one problem I have had (mostly operator error) is that when I'm done running I will press the stop button, the unit confirms the counter has stopped, but on two occasions when I've gone to up load the data I found that the unit kept tracking me all the way home and then kept running even in my house. The end result is that I ended up with about 20 hours of data which was a complete waste and of course had to be discarded as useless. Now I always make sure I turn the unit completely off when I'm done working out so that this does not happen any more. Problem solved.
Bottom line is that I'd buy it again with out thinking twice and I'd highly recommend it to anyone that is interested in tracking their performance over time. It actually makes working out more fun.
My Best Running Purchase
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is one of the best things I have ever purchased. It works almost flawlessly.
It is compatable with Mac OS.The software that is included is Mac compatable and the Motionbased.com online software also works with safari and firefox.
The Forerunner 305 made me never want to run on a TM again. Why would I when I can obtain all the data and run outside.
Great for recuperation too !
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Garmin Forerunner 305 - Speed and Distance Monitor & Heart Rate Monitor
To start with, I'm a disabled veteran, 3 herniated discs, and have had both hips totally replaced. Prior to my injuries, I ran 7-milers, swam laps for 1.5 hours, and biked in excess of 30-40 miles, & also worked out at a gym. After my injuries I found myself unable to exercise for # 10 years. Now I'm 45, and do not want to blow my heart out, because I foolishly try to work out like I used to.
This Forerunner 305 can watch your heart rate at many different levels, and help you motivate, and pace in ways that just were not possible, in a little package like this 10 years back ! I can Power walk, and ride a recumbent bike, and even though this watch is marketed at runners & cyclists, using it for walking and hiking are among its major talents too. There is a bit of a learning curve, but the rewards, are a very flexibly progammed unit that frees you from guess work, and keeps you on track, when your trying to re-build your body after major surgeries.
It suggests heart rate settings for different aerobic levels, and creates zones for them. Remember though IF YOU DO NOT SIT DOWN WITH THIS UNIT AND ITS MANUAL FOR A FEW HOURS OR MORE, you will miss out on just how flexible and customizable it realy is ! I noticed a lot of complaints about this unit, and I think most of them are being made by people who refuse to read the MANUAL. As with most things in life, what you put into it is what you will get out of it. If you are lazy and hate to read & learn, then stay away from intelligent devices like this one, as it was never made for you. If you have half a brain, then grab one of these, and I suggest getting the foot pod that goes with it. If you hit a stormy sretch or worse, you still keep traking your speed along with time and heart rate. Go to your Local health club and find out your V02 max and ideal heart rate levels. Your local Dr. can often do this too. it's good to have these starting levels professionally targeted ahead of time, but the watch will do a rough estimate for you.
I have experienced no hardware or software failures of any kind as of yet with this unit. I updated the Garmin exercise software that came with the unit, I updated the USB Drivers, the watches GPS drivers, and the watches GUI software too. These are all avaiable at Garmin's website. Do It first befor you start using it for workouts etc. If you are not tech savy, then call Garmin tech support, as I had no trouble reaching them. It was an 8 minute wait... Remember Walking, carefull execise, and nutrition helps heal Back injuries ! Try juicing lots of organic veg. & fruit too. and get off that damn junk food and fast food, or you will never heal. I know, I did the wrong things first, but when I cleaned up my diet,and started walking, I lost @ 55 pounds, and healed up almost compleatly.
Hope you found this helpfull etc...
Indispensible Running Tool - Can't run without it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Pros:
* GPS works and is accurate. And it's worked in three countries, in and out of woods and in remote areas. Reception is very good
* You plug the USB into your computer and device syncs your workouts to your PC automatically. No fussing. Software also allows you to add other work-outs when you are not using the device.
* It holds a charge. Good battery life.
* It pushes you to keep to a pace. I have found that device is an excellent work-out coach.
* Large but surprisingly lightweight.
Cons (and they are MINOR)
* It is LARGE. Not a problem for me but if aesthetics are important to you or if you have a small wrist, this could be a problem.
* No key guard. If you accidentally bump a button in course of run, it stops. This can be frustrating.
* Satellites can take a bit to connect when you start
I love it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I previously owned the 301 and was often frustrated with the poor satelite reception and the heart rate monitor. The 305 has made some wonderful improvements. The HRM seems to work much better and I do not have interruptions the way I used to. The satelite reception also is much better and I rarely lose signal.
I use the 305 for running, cycling, backcountry skiing and mountaineering and it works very well for all of it.
Great Product!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Overall, it's a great product. Quality materials. Highly functional.
Key Features:
-Heart Rate Monitor strap is comfortable and the HR data is accurate.
-GPS takes about 20 seconds to lock in when you turn it on.
-Autolap every mile is a great feature that keeps you on track.
-3 different display screens that you can configure and autoscroll lets you control what data you see during your workout.
-Training Center and MotionBased software is ok. I prefer SportTracks since it's more flexible.
Forerunner 305 Rocks!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Excellent Purchase. It's made my training much more interesting. I can chart and accurately measure my trail-running and monitor my heart rate. I have a really nice log of where and when I've run. Contrary to what is claimed on the amazon website, there is Mac OS compatible software for my iMac that came with the device. The map database is not very accurate, but it's close enough.
Best training tool ever!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 is simply a great training tool. If you are a data head and love to have metrics to measure your progress, the Garmin Forerunner 305 is for you. Very easy to use and amazing accuracy on distance and pace. It is a little bulky, but the light weight helps counteract the size. Highly recommended.
Excellent watch for running
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 7, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought this watch for my wife about nine months ago. The Garmin Forerunner 305 was very easy to setup.
My wife uses it every day she goes for a run. When she is done she plugs it into the docking station and downloads her run. It is fun to see the miles, distance, heart rate etc...
This watch has helped her train better by knowing instantly what her pace is, how far she has run and how long it has taken her.
We've never had any problems with this unit and highly recommend it for anyone looking a running watch.
wow wow wow top notch gadget
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 7, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is a real handy device for those who do not like to train in groups but still want some competition during their training/work out.
br /
br /I waited for some time buying it because there was no Mac support. However now that that is available there was no need to hold off any more. The device has so many function that I am still trying to find out what I can do with it. Fortunately the many discussion groups give a lot of support in that matter.
br /
br /There is one thing that is a bit of a down point and that is the length of the straps. My wrists are slightly bigger than the average one and I can hardly close it.
br /
br /In any way from now on I have a very strict trainer that tracks all my actions.
Great Running Companion
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 5, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I am a triathlete and used the Garmin Forerunner 305 to train for and race my first marathon. Its heart rate and real time pace functions helped me stay on track during the marathon when my body was getting tired and my mind wanted to wander. It's like having a training buddy or personal pace-setter. Its GPS enabled functions also make ideal for cycling as there is no need for speed magnet sensors. The displays are easy to read and customizable.
Garmin Forerunner 305 with Heart Rate Monitor
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Nov 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought one of these earlier this year and love it. I mostly use it to ride. My son has used it to run and now asks to use it anytime he does run. It is really cool how it graphs out the different statistics for each workout and gives you a map of the course you took. I have not played with the more advanced features of it, but my brother who has one has used it to compete with himself on his prior rides. It tells you wheather you are ahead of or behind your best ride over the same route. I liked this so much I bought 2 more to give as Christmas gifts to my kids who also ride.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Nov 11, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I love the Garmin 305 It has really added to my running enjoyment knowing exactly how far that I have run and the speed that I am running as well as my heart rate. It will help me develop my running skills
Very Pleased
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 6, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I recieved this watch for my birthday. I did alot of research before and was torn between the newest model and this one. I decided to go with th 395 because of the wealth of reviews and the negative reviews from the newer model. Definately the rigt choice. I have used in in downtown INDy as well as in wooded areas. I have never had difficult getting a signal. No problems and am happy I went with the 305. It is slightly bigger than a regular watch but I dont where it to make a fashion statement. Great workout partner
I'm amazed with this....
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 5, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
WOW!! I was wondering if I should get the 305 or the new 405. I read probably all the reviews on both and finally decided for the 305. I just did my first run with it yesterday... only 7 miles but, I'm amazed by the size and reception.
br /I'm in East Africa and thought about the reception. I have to go under two bridges and over them in my route... Never lost the signal.
br /As soon as I opened the package and turn it on, even inside my house, I got the gps signal. It was so easy to set up and understand how to use it.
br /The 305 was a little big at first but, I wear in my wrist and felt like my old timex expedition... not a problem!!
br /I haven't use the HR monitor yet, but it seems great. My wife has the Garmin 50 and we can both run with the HR after they are sync with their watches. It makes the run easier and more enjoyable!!!
br /Great product, great buy... fun to run with!!
Great while it lasted
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 14, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have used my Garmin Forerunner 305 for about a year and a half. It was always well taken care of. It was never dropped or submerged in water. I have used the Forerunner 305 to help train for several races including half-marathons, military physical training tests, dualathons... The Garmin was a great tool to help gauge my exertion level and speed. I really enjoyed being able to just hit the pavement and run without really planning out a distance route ahead of time. After running I could download my training session to the pc and track my progress.
br /
br /Then about a week ago during a race my watch just stopped. I can reboot it and it stays on as long as I don't put any pressure on the back of the watch. There seems to be a short somewhere under the back plate of the watch. Of course the warranty has now expired...which leaves me wondering what to buy now. I don't want to drop another $200 bucks on the same model and only have it last another year or so...
br /
great training enhancer
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is an outstanding product that will really improve your fitness and performance. The features and ability to use it for both cycling and hiking or running make it very versatile. When used with training peaks software (subscription based) the features are much more enhanced and I believe it makes the product much more useful. There are a few flaws, such as large bulky size and the altimeter/calorie burn algorithms are not very good. Spot elevation seems to be accurate but total elevation is typically double the actual number. This should be fixed through some smoothing software upgrade but it is not very accurate as of this date. The calorie burn function is pretty accurate for cycling but seems drastically over ambitious for walking and hiking-again a software update should fix this at some point. If you want good elevation and calorie numbers for cycling use the Edge 305 as it uses a barometric altimeter to help average out some of the errors but this is a great all around device.
Almost Perfect
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 22, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 306 is the best training device yet for serious runners. A few tweaks would make it perfect.
PROS: Lightweight, comfortable to wear. Quickly locates GPS satellites. Highly accurate course measurements. Very easy to set up and customize. Included software is easy to use. Free Motion Based trial allows links to Google Maps (but must upgrade to fee-based Google Maps account)
CONS: Battery life is disappointing. Charging device is cumbersome and poorly engineered: should have been designed with USB port in device, which would have simplified charging and sync-ing immensely. Doesn't consider grade in calorie calculations. Screen difficult to see at night, even with backlight. OLED would be better.
OVERALL: Buy it, use it, love it. It's a primo motivator.
Great watch
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 20, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is my first running watch I purchased, very easy to operate, very helpfull training for the NYC marathon. Amazon was great to purchase from, just a great experince.
Ideal for the compulsive runner
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Mar 10, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Ideal for the compulsive runner, who wants to know just how far he or she has gone. The accelerometer based instruments just aren't accurate enough.
It's really fun to take on an airplane. It works when held up to a window. You can go a mile in 10 seconds.
I would like to see an external battery power supply or recharging device. 10 h is not long enough for an overnight trip.
Awesome running/biking performance-tracking tool
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Mar 10, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have only used the Forerunner 305 for about 5 runs during a month period. It is an awesome running/biking performance-tracking tool. However, sometimes, it seems like it has a problem with immediately tracking quick changes in pace on the watch - even though the changes can be viewed later on the associated performance tracking software. My other complaint is the battery needs to be charged the night before running because it seems like it leaks after being fully charged for a couple of days without use. Other than the pace-change monitoring on the watch and battery leakage, it is one awesome piece of equipment - so one can track their running/biking performance including heart bpm, pace, and even a path on a map. Also, I got it in a great sale on Amazon. I guess I can't have it all.
All-in-all very good
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Feb 26, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
As an Army officer I get a lot of benefit from my Garmin. It allows me to monitor my pace and MPH. My heart monitor works great and I have no problems at all in acquiring satellites. I would like a map feature on the Garmin for urban orienteering, but maybe that will come in a new model. Also, It would have more applications with a navigation tool for Hash Run and scavenger hunt events. The mapping system is pretty good (when you update), but it does not seem to talk to other programs like Google Earth, which has much better mapping, imagery and sharing capabilities. All-in-all this is a great tool, but it could use a software update and a mapping feature. It is too bad, since Garmin has other products and software that perform these functions.
Garmin 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Feb 25, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 wrist mounted GPS fitnes computer with heart rate monitor functions as advertised and is fairly simple to operate. Here are some areas of improvemnt Garmin could make. 1) The heart rate (BPM) is very hard to read due to the size of the font when in lap pace mode. 2) If you leave the Garmin on and the battery drains, the last workout is erased. Other than that, I would recommend this product to anyone who wants to document their weekly milage while managing their heart rate through preset user profile settings. Another great feature is the Garmin Training Center where you have the ability to download and save your workouts or plan courses before you run them. I would say this feature is also a key part of the 305 that any runner/biker would appreciate.
305 vs. 201 - Gotchas that will cost you in $$$ or frustration
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My advices is go with more stable/robust 4XX series if you can afford it but a good alternative is the 3XX series. The 4XX touch screen capacity will likely be a big benefit in colder climates where you need to were gloves and fumbling with buttons is tough.
br /
br /I started out with the Garmin Forerunner 201 Wrist-Mounted GPS Fitness Computer and upgraded to the 305. I have had the 201 for about 4 years and the 305 2 years. My wife uses my 201 for measuring her walking. So it is still ticking and never needed repair like the 305. I run about 20 miles a week so they get used alot. Here are the improvements on the 305 over the 201:
br /
br /1. The software has greater stability. This is really important because unstable is frustrating. Even with updates the 201 would totally lock up every once in a while randomly but mostly during satellite acquisition on start up. I also travel throughout North America so I am not sure if the location changes was confusing the software.
br /
br /2. The satellite electronics is significantly more sensitive to signals so you can start your run sooner. With the 201 I often had to wait for the 3 required satellites to lock in before running. When its cold out that seems like forever.
br /
br /3. The heart rate monitor feature is a good addition if it works. Right now it doesn't and it will cost me to get it repaired - min charge is $99. So I will likely just get the new generation 4XX. Maybe the wife is getting it for me for christmas.
br /
br /4. The 305 just quite on me after the 1st year and I had to send it back for the $99 repair. It took 2 weeks. Luckily I could steal back my 201 from my wife.
br /
br /5. All the features are similiar between the two watches - uploading run data to the computer (USB vs. serial port), workouts including long runs or intervals, pace buddy, setting a customized screen (mine is run time, pace and distance) and many others.
br /
br /6. While the 201 and 305 are button oriented the latest generation 4XX series all have touch screen capability. This is likely a key consideration for someone like me who runs outdoors in 20 F and snow up here in Toronto, Ontario, Canada - or if your thick fingered.
br /
br /
Works on my Mac
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great product, and even though it claims incompatibility with Macs, the included software works just fine on my iMac G4.Garmin Forerunner 305 - Speed and Distance Monitor & Heart Rate Monitor
Great Training Tool
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin 305 fits nicely on your wrist and is loaded with a wealth of information. The GPS system have never failed me thus far and it is great knowing your heart rate and pace at the same time. Most of my running is done in a tree lined park located in upstate New York and the GPS works without a hitch. I highly recommend this running tool for anyone who jogs or competively runs for races of any distance above 2 miles.
Fantastic training tool - even for a novice runner!!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is an absolutely fantastic product, and well worth the price tag (Amazon does have the best price as of Nov 07). I have recently taken up running (48 yr old male, 200 lbs) and this was my my personal reward for breaking the 4-mile barrier after starting running in Sept 07.
It's great because it gives very accurate mileage, tracks heart rate, and the info can be exported to Google Earth so you can visually plot your runs! It has auto settings to give you average pace, it can reset each lap automatically (so you know how fast you've run each mile on a long run), and keeps track of a wealth of info you can export directly into your computer via USB.
Whether you buy it or not...keep running!
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a fabulous tool. I love my Forerunner. It motivates me to run and does everything I ever expected it to do. This is a must have for serious runners or beginners who want to get serious. No more trailing your path in your car to see how far it is, no more guessing how far you have run, no more wavering on what path to take. This is a must have.
Love it!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I'm training for my first half marathon. I have never been a runner and really not much of an athlete. I'm making a lot of postive lifestyle changes and am using the forerunner as part of my training. It is a great way for me to track improvements and also helps me push myself by maintaining a higher heart rate. I highly recommend this product to others.
Over 1,500 miles logged on it so far
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I have had my 305 since March and I can't imagine going without it now. I've used a heart rate monitor for several years, but making the jump to the Garmin 305 has greatly impacted my training. Here's the skinny on the unit-
Pros:
Data, data, and more data.
Quick and stable heart rate info.
Easy to use.
Lightweight (slightly larger than a watch, but come on it's a GPS!)
Great battery life.
Ample onboard memory storage for long runs or multiple runs.
Comfortable chest strap and watch strap.
Outstanding user defined settings and easy to see data fields.
Cons:
Sometimes takes 1 - 2 minutes to lock onto satellites upon startup.
Charts in software are fairly generic, but then again it isn't meant to be a TomTom.
Heart rate chest strap radio frequency is not recognized by any of the equipment at my gym, so I have to wear the wrist watch portion which looks pretty silly.
All in all the ease of use, plethora of available training data, and reliability easily allows me to give this the top rating. What a great time we are living in! Happy running!!!
Best Training tool around
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I was very hesitant to purchase the Forerunner 305 as I had read many reviews, some of which were not pleasant. I finally ordered one around a month ago and have been nothing but amazed since then.
First off, the one con I was most nervous about was the satellite reception issues people have had. After a month I have not had one dropped satellite in the month of running. The unit has found satellites within 15 seconds of turning it on....in my house. The longest it has taken was about 45 seconds on a very rainy day. I run on primarily back roads with heavy trees with an occasional trail. My watch beeps within 3-4 strides of my lap marker (since I use the autolap feature).
The next concern I had was in regard to the heart rate monitoring. I have used a polar F11 prior to the forerunner for several years. While the polar was a great tool, I sometimes had difficulty acquiring a HR. The forerunner seems to pick up a HR as I'm putting the chest strap on. I have been impressed with the comfort of the strap and accuracy of the telemetry.
As for battery life, I have not done many training sessions over 3 hours, but I have never run out of battery. I can understand if you wouldn't be able to recharge for a few days that it may be a problem, but I tend to sync after every run.
I was a little worried about the size of the unit, but once it is on my wrist it is very comfortable and not cumbersome at all. The size lends well to good visiblity. the display is very easy to read and highly customizable with sport specific display pages.
Along with the pros, there are some cons I feel I have to agree with. The elevation and grade features are generally useless. GPS is simply not designed for elevation unless you are in to aviation grade GPS. If you require accurate grade and elevation data this unit is not for you.
The Garmin Training center software is very good, but has some glitches Garmin hasn't fixed yet. If you create courses in the Training Center software, you may experience difficulty syncing the watch with the PC. I had to erase all my course data and reset the watch in order to restore the sync capability.
Overall I am very pleased with the function of the watch and highly reccommend it to anyone wanting further motivation for training.
Works well, display hard to read.
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 31, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I own the Garmin 301 and the 305. The 301 has advantages over the 305 display since it has larger fonts. It is near impossible to read the H/R while running unless you modify the settings from 3 to 4 display modes. I usually alternate between 3 & 4 while running to check my H/R; with the 301 I never had a problem. Also, looking at history the display is very tiny and I used to turn the light on to read the tiny fonts. Now I just download directly to the computer so I don't have to fuss with it.
The improvements for the 305 are senstivity. I never loose the satilites anymore in trees or around buildings. I've only lost is once while walking under a low overhead concrete bridge. This thing is so sensitive the auto pause will turn back on with any movement, but you can change the auto pause to a specific pace/speed so it won't turn back on while standing around. The new charging system is awesome compared to the old one. With the 301, the connectors eventually started corroding and I needed to wiggle it around a little to get it to start charging. The new one sets into a pod for charging so this will never be a problem. Overall this is a much better unit except for the display being smaller than the 301. I would recommend this product to anyone wanting to train by pace or H/R. It works great!
garmin 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 19, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a toy that I purchased for myself 02/07. I thought it would be a good idea to keep track of my progress. Once I got the until, I plugged it in, put my info in, and took it for a test drive. I am currently training for a 1/2 marathon and I would have to say this tool is way more than a toy. It works great. It is dependable. The battery last for a long time. I put the unit on and it flashed with a low battery display. I started the run anyway. To my surprise after 1.5 hrs it was still working. This thing looks bigger than it feels. I also do triathlons and I don't have a problem riding with it on my bike. The only problem is when I set a hard speed workout that little digital guy get the better of me more than I would like to admit. All BS aside you will enjoy seeing your progress. Fyi my wife is getting one soon.
Works as advertised
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Mar 7, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
No complaints so far, all software and hardware works fine. I'm using the Garmin for cross country skiing and on my stair master. Can't wait til spring to use it for cycling, the main purpose for the purchase.
G
Much better than expected
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Mar 3, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Very good, excellent for runners. Very good software.
The interconexion with google earth is fantastic.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Mar 1, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought the Garmin 305 for my husbands birthday. He loves it. I have the 301 which has been great. I thought the 305 would be great for him beacause it has the heart rate monitor. He does alot of marathon running and wanted to keep track of his heart rate. The only thing we find difficult with it is how small the heart rate number is. You have to put the device up close to see what your heart rate is. Other wise it has been great so far.
Great Fitness Product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Feb 27, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My first GPS product and I'm very pleased with it so far. I walk long distances on back roads and trails on varied routes. This unit provides a ton of data, much more than my previous "watches" and the download to the training log is fast and easy. Having distance, altitude, heartrate, pace, time and a map of the course right there is wonderful. It is large, but not cumbersome. I expect that I'll use more of the features as time goes on. The battery life works well for me. Highly recommended!
It's great--but you already know that, right?
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Feb 27, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Gee... what can I say that hasn't been said dozens of times in the other reviews? Well, here's my story: I started out with the Garmin Forerunner 101, which kept me happy for a long time. But I eventually decided to pony up the cash and upgrade to the newer 305, even though I was initially hesitant to spend that kind of dough. The main allure to the 305 was the promise of stronger GPS communication than the older 101.
The 101 would frequently lose the GPS signals when I was running down deep in the valley under heavy tree cover, making it about as useful as an ordinary stopwatch. As my running program progressed, I found myself doing more and more runs in this area, and the poor communication between the 101 and the GPS satellites was frustrating to say the least. I would "lose credit" for large portions of my run, and the speed/pace readings would be skewed to the point of being worthless. The 305 is worlds better under these conditions, and I only briefly get the "weak GPS signals" warning on rare occasions.
I have also grown to love the 305's heart rate monitor, and I really enjoy looking at my workout data in graphical form on the PC screen when I get home. Mapping my completed long runs on Google Earth and playing around with that program is just too cool for words! I also bought the Garmin foot pod so I can continue to use my 305 trainer when I'm stuck indoors on the treadmill. I highly recommend it!
one of the best investments you can make a runner
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Feb 19, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Ok first let me say. This is one of the best investments you can make as a runner other than a good pair of running shoes. Ive had this for about 7 months now and absolutely love it. Whats so good about this unit? Well first of all you can run anywhere and not have to worry about mile markers. This openes up so much more possibilities on where you can run. You know exactly how far you have ran. Its really accurate. If your a runner who is competitive and trying to increase their minute/mile or training for that race or you just want to increase your stamina/endurance than this watch will be a godsend. If your one of those people who goes and run and really don't care your distance or if you improve your time then this watch is probably not for you. Now i do have to tell you sometimes when you turn the watch on it can take 3-5 minutes to acquire a satellite after its locked it does a really good job of holding onto a signal. For me it looses it at two places where i generally run. I run under a big metal bridge (under an interstate) and i run through a tunnel that looks like a big gutter (made out of metal). I would expect it to loose signal in both of these places. Otherwise i run through some heavily wooded areas and it never looses a signal.
Some of the bad things ive read about the watch are the following:
1) Support for the MAC
2) Elevation readings
3) Calorie Readings
I tell you even if i couldn't use the watch with my PC i would be totally happy. The PC software is kind of cool how you can map your route but the watches ability to get accurate distance/time measurements is the MOST important thing. I really don't care about elevation or calorie readings. There are calculations you can find on google how to determine a estimate anyways.
Ok i will have to tell you. When i bought the garmin i had a $[...] rebate. If i didn't i probably would have got the 205 instead of the 305. The 205 is the same but it doesn't have the heart rate monitor (which i never seem to wear anyways) and you can buy accessories for the 305 that you can't get for the 205 but the important point is the 205 has the IMPORTANT features. If i were you i would look at the accessories available for the 305 and/or decide if the heart rate monitor are that important to you to justify the $[...] price difference
Great GPS Device
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 2, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I purchased this Garmin in the spring of 2008 so i have had some time to use it through the summer. The 305 has some improvements over the previous model. The reception is better if you are walking under a canopy of trees than the previous model. Also the calorie counter is much more accurate on this model. The device holds a charge well and the heart rate monitor works well. Sometimes it can be a little slow acquiring a signal when first turned on so i make sure i turn it on 5 minutes or so before i start running. All in all i havent had any trouble with this Garmin and i would recommend to anyone who likes keeping track of their workouts and distances.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 1, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have used the Forerunner 305 a dozen times. A couple 5k runs and the other times indoors on a treadmill and bike trainer. So far it's great. At first it felt a little bulky on my wrist but since it's not a problem. Loading the software to the computer was easy. The transfering of info to the computer is also very easy, just plug in the USB cable to the computer and the 305 into the cradle, it'a all automatic. It's very easy to switch between modes, and also to set up the display to customize what you want to see. I'm very happy I purchased the 305.
Garmin watches are great for recording training and racing statistics
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Nov 2, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin 305 replaces my Garmin 205, which I gave to my husband. I upgraded only to get the heart rate monitor. Both models are great to record training and racing statistics.
Perfect!!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Confortable and easy to use. Quick satelite connection. Looks big but is very light wheight and its size helps data visualization. Buy yours!!!
best birthday gift I've ever bought for myself
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My wife bought me a Nike sportband for my training but it wouldn't ever calibrate for my slow running so I returned it and bought this instead. This thing is amazing in its capabilities. Since September I've dropped my 5k time by 3 minutes since I can now watch my heart rate stay in the proper zone so I don't short sell myself while not overdoing it.
Works Great!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.2 out of 10
Created: Oct 14, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I was originally thinking about the Forerunner 205 with the thought that a heart-rate sensor wasn't that important but after reading through information at various sites I decided I might want the heart-rate monitor. I am sure glad I got it. This device was very good as I ran my first half-marathon recently and has worked without a flaw through all of my training. I definitely recommend it!
Very unreliable
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Nov 20, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought a Garmin Forerunner to help me train for running a marathon. The unit is great, and it has been a huge help in training. However, the unit keeps malfunctioning--I am currently on my fourth Forerunner. On Forerunner #1, the GPS went out. On Forerunners #2-4, the device just died, and wouldn't turn on. Or if I could turn it on, it would turn itself off after a short period of time. Luckily I bought it at REI and they have been good about exchanging the device.
br /
br /I really like this device, but I would advice against buying it. Also, Garmin's customer service isn't the best. Once you actually get to speak with someone, they are helpful; however, plan to wait on hold for 45 minutes to an hour.
garmin forerunner 305
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
good product a little big on the wrist which takes some getting used to. the screen is not as easy to read when actually running as i would have liked and it takes a while to get used to all the functions. but overall good.
Great - 97% of the time
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 3, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Works well most of the time; however, occationally will "yo-yo" between the pace I'm holding and about 7-8 minutes above that (e.g. - at a 8 minute pace, will fluxuate between 8 and 15:30 pace while I'm maintaining speed). This usually only lasts for about 5 minutes or so and doesn't happen often - but is annoying when it does.
garmin is good
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 26, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I had the polar rs200sd before and I think that the garmin does more things better but is more complicated and hard to use all features and i do miss the way polar displayed the information. it was easier to use in real time, but the garmin is functionng better and does more..
garmin 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 24, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Everything is as per my expectations. The only limit I see is the accuracy and I will investigate in the next future how reliable is the gps. Very much appreciated the possibility to customize the fields on the page. The Visual Partner is a good help for long workouts.
So far so good
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I'm still learning how to use the little wrist machine but so far I like what it can do. At one point though I think the pace was off but it could be because I was running under a concrete awning (if that makes sense). But overall it's pretty freaking cool.
Great training instrument
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The garmin forerunner 305 is very usefull in any kind of training, indoor and outdoor. Heasy to use but also with many interesting capabilities and a great computer interface and training software. For me it has only a defect.. it can't be used while swimming.
Nice device
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This device has helped me (with chest band) to monitor and control my heartbeat and thereby keep my training at a consistently increasing level of challenge. The menu system is both simple and complete. The unit is NOT bulky, and only slightly larger than a watch. My two negatives are that it takes 3-4 minutes for the unit to lock in on satellites for my morning run (not 30 seconds to one minute), and the accuracy on altitude is not very precise. Running a flat track, the accumulated increases and decreases in altitude were both sizable and meaningless. BUT, on a hike in the Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas, the 900 foot mountains were clearly tracked. The Motion Based website and associated analytics (information included with the unit) have been invaluable, and I encourage anyone buying this unit to seriously consider going for it. All in all, I'm tempted to give this unit a top rating, and it's only the minor inconveniences mentioned above that keep me from doing so. All in all, the Garmin 305 is a great aid in keeping one honest with oneself, and in OBJECTIVELY monitoring metrics associated with training -- especially cardiovascular conditioning!
Improved, but not perfect...
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I've been running for about 4 years and the best purchase by far had been my Garmin 201. It was really neat to be able to track my mileage and pace. The problem was that I would run the exact same route twice and get up to a 10% discrepancy in distance. So I finally bought the 305 with heart monitor. Very consistent distances. The problem now is the elevations are totally wacky. I just ran the Philadelphia Marathon today and my Garmin registered the total elevation for the course as 4470 ft; the race material claims it's around 100! Also, I have noticed somewhat wild variations in the heart rate readings. Pending a visit to a cardiologist, I suspect that feature is also not very precise. One definite advantage is being able to download data to my Mac (impossible with the 201), but again, when viewing data on the computer, it is impossible to see mileage totals for a week. For that, one has to go to the wrist unit.
Garmin 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I have had the Garmin 305 for almost 2 months. The GPS function works well. I mostly use it on my road bike. The dual bike mode is handy for those with multiple bikes. The data review functions in Training Cener is nice to review a days work out and determine progress. I run Windows Vista and have not had any compatibility issues. I did install the one patch that is recomneded for Vista on the Garmin web site. The only negative on this was that the heart monitor that shipped with the new unit was bad out of the box. I called Garmin customer service and got a new one set on warranty. The originally quoted ship date was not met. I had to call back 2 other times and was told that they had some in stock for "distributors" and would try to get me one shipped out but never did. I think the Garmin Customer Service is poor but the product rocks.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great workout item. I use it for running and biking, and it does a great job tracking speed and distance. I bought this in Sept 06, and had a few problems with running pace. This was fixed with some software updates in April 07. The only drawback to this product is the very poor heartrate monitor. It works most of the time when I run, but doesn't work at all for biking. It shows spikes of over 200 bpm for the first 2 miles, then settles down a bit, but still has spikes over the rest of the ride. The colder the weather, the worse the heartrate monitor works. I would recommend the 205 and another heartrate monitor.
Good GPS distance, Small heart rate displace
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
First, I use this for running only.
The Good:
The GPS is pretty good, I set up the auto lap and everytime when I get close to the starting point, it will record my lap. It is not right on the spot, about 10' +/- from the orginal point.
It gives you the pace, distance and time right there on the watch.
The software allows you to download your training, you can view the distance vs heartrate, time vs heartrate, etc.
The bad:
The heart rate displace on the watch is very very small, you cannot read the readout while you are running. The only thing can help to resolve this is the watch allows you to set you heartrate zone and set off the alarm when you exceed or fall below the heartrate zone, from zone one to zone five. One being the lowest range, five the highest range. I set my alarm to go off if I exceed zone five. Then I have to slow down. Even the alert displace is small, I would recommend the company to use the entire screen to displace the alert message in large font instead of currently using only 20% of the screen space in the center.
The alert alarm is OK if you are not using a mp3 player, if you wear one during running, you may miss the alert from time to time.
If you run on a treadmill, it will not record your calorie burn and distance because you are not moving, but the heartrate mointor still work.
Conclusion:
I give the watch a 8.5 out of 10 and it is a keeper.
Great training tool!
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 24, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Absolutely love running with my Garmin Forerunner 305. Takes all the guess work out and it's so cool you can download the results to your computer. Before I'd have to go to the USATF website and map out my runs, now I don't have to. The only thing I don't like about it is that the heart rate and time indicators are pretty small to read. I'd need reading glasses to see them...and I'm not going to carry those on my runs! Other than that, this is a great tool for serious runners.
Garmin Forerunner 305 w/HRM
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Apr 1, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I received my Garmin about a month ago. I love it. The HRM didn't take anytime for me to get used to since I typically run in a sports bra and am used to having something binding me lightly in the chest. The watch monitor itself is a bit cumbersome and gave me a stone bruise on my wrist by the second time I wore it. My wrist is an "in between" size so maybe that caused it. Eventually, I see that I will change out the watch band straps for velcro? so that I can get a better fit. The monitor and computer are wonderful though. I look forward to training even more now that I have this great machine to track my performance and progress. Well worth that money spent. Even with the stone bruise, I'd buy it again today.
What a difference!
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I use to use the Polar RS200 heart rate monitor with the footpod and just recently upgraded to the Garmin Forerunner 305. What a difference! The Forerunner 305 is much more precise, provides much more information on the screen and the heart rate monitor band is much more confortable. Great product even though satellites acquisition could be faster
Great product but mine is not quite loud enough
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 18, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
After reading alot of reviews of the various models I chose this one. It works pretty much as expected but the volume on mine is not as loud as those belonging to the other people I'm running with. It seems to be getting better though.
Lots of data - easy to use
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Really like this tool for capturing any run that's not on the track or treadmill. Although it's large, it's not heavy and the chest strap is as comfortable as any other (of not more so). The charging unit (remember to keep it charged) and usb port to download data is very easy to use.
I still haven't used it to it's fullest capabilities - have not created workouts yet, nor have I used it on the bike - but it's great for keeping track of and analyzing data.
There is a web site that you can long onto that will give you even more tools - maps and so forth. It's very informative once you get there, but I would say the only negative is that you had to jump around a lot to find what you were looking for. This part wasn't overly intuitive.
But all in all a great way to keep an accurate count of your workouts.
Battery concerns
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 has just about everything you could even dream about when it comes to running with a computer. The learning curve can be quite long if you really wanna get the most out of this product. But was very easy to get it working for the basics, which is more then most pedometer products already. The only thing so far I can say I don't like about this product is how fast the battery dies. If you forget to turn it off after a workout then by the next day or two the device is already dead. I'm sure there probably is an auto off option but haven't found that yet. With a charge time greater then an hour, its not like you can really wait for it to charge before you start your workout. Just gotta get into the habit of turning off my watch when i'm not using it. The heart rate monitor works well and the device is quite large, but it is what you expect from a GPS device on your wrist.
This is one great product
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have to say I agree with all the other reviews, I would be lost with out it now. The watch has worked great in Rochester, NY. I have only had it for 3 months, and I have no complaints.
Pros:
-never frozen
-great accuracy
- enjoy the quick interval training
-Virtual running partner
-Heart rate monitor
-Light is bright enough
-I haven't had any trouble with the pace, my pace is accurate for the most part.
Cons:
-Beeping cannot be heard if headphones are in
-elevation as everyone has said is not good
-software isn't anything great
I can see running under tree cover as an issue but I have only had the product in the winter so can't say much there. I love it and can't wait to use it in races.
Enjoy!
Excellent Product
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The unit itself is a little big, but I love the feedback it gives for all of my workouts.
Awesome training tool with weak included software
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I use the 305 almost exclusively for running. The unit has great GPS reception, a multitude of functions and flexibility, and it is easy to use. The rechargeable battery is a great feature and it is a far better setup than the monitor that I previously had that had to be sent in to get the battery replaced. This GPS/HR monitor is an awesome training tool. I really love it and enjoy using it.
That being said, the reason I only gave four stars is because of the weak software that is included with the unit. The Garmin Training Center software is very basic, with a very limited map presentation. They could provide users a much better software product that would make better use of the data that is collected. No doubt, the reason Garmin doesn't do this though is because they have a web-based product that costs $90 per year for full access that is more in line with what it should be. To me this is like a fine restaurant charging extra for a napkin. Garmin produces fine products. I expected that the included software would be much better than it is.
Could be better, could be worse..
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Kudos: Small form factor, comfortable, picks up signal well in heavy cover. PC version of Training Center is pretty decent. Works for running as well as cycling. Pretty accurate - only ever had ONE reading that made me go "HUH?". Does what it's supposed to, somewhat user-friendly.
Complaints: Takes forever to lock on to satellites when first fired up. Pain in the *** to get it to switch between different sports - running and cycling. I've had it put sports in the wrong folder in TC. Sequence of info screens is a little awkward. No way to UNpair with a cadence unit or chest strap.The Mac version of Training Center is LAME. Kind of annoying to have to "zero" info out of the screen if you haven't downloaded data between workouts - I mean, wouldn't you think it would be smart enough to know that TODAY'S workout isn't part of YESTERDAY'S workout, especially given that I've SHUT THE UNIT OFF between workouts?
Garmin customer service isn't too bad. I had issues with my first Edge 305 and called them. Yes, it took forever to get through (that's what they make speakerphones for), but once I got a human, they took care of me quickly. Had a second Edge 305 that I crashed my bike and broke the LCD. Went to their website and sent CS an email - and got back a very generic response: "Maybe we can remotely troubleshoot the unit and you won't have to send it in!" (Well gee, the screen is cracked and all psychedelic looking if you can "remotely troubleshoot" that, I'll be very, very impressed!) After a few more emails, they took care of the problem.
Great product!
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 8, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I've used this for about five bike rides and five runs. So far it is awesome. I have the cadence unit for my bike and I swap it between my bike and running quickly and easily. Has so many great features on the watch. I set it up to automatically do a lap for every mile when I run. You also have quite a few choices for what data you want to view. You can see four of them at a time on the screen.
Things I'd like to have: Waterproof for swimming, better software (its not bad, but not great).
Thats its only shortfall that I can see. it would be nice if it were smaller for running (see 405 for that), but if it were too small, then it would be hard to see on the bike. So far I'm very happy with this product. It even picks up sattelites sometimes in my house.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Sep 30, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Shipping took longer than expected but received product as advertised. I've used the Garmin 305 for 3 weeks now and so far has worked well. Would recommend to someone looking for GPS unit for running.
Does everything I wanted
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Sep 30, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I wanted to be able to get my mileage from my trail runs, and also heart rate information from my runs for training purposes. I like the product, it give me everything I wanted. The only drawback is the www.motionbased.com link that you can use free as part of this, only gives you access to the last 10 activities on your list. To see all your activities in this interface is to pay a costly monthly, or yearly fee. I really would like a more in depth software (running log) that incorporates the data from the Garmin, shoe mileage, report capabilities etc. that I only have to pay for one time (I'm a tight scotsman, and hate to pay monthly).
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Sep 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I think it's great. I'm training for a marathon and haven't even dived into all of the bells and whistles, but so far, it seems pretty accurate. The heart rate monitor works well too.
Great Customer Service
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 17, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I have had my Garmin Forerunner 305 for a couple of months now. I love it. I use it for running, biking, and occasionally hiking. Recently, I have had trouble getting it to make good connection with the syncing/charging cradle. I called Garmin's Customer Service about it. They are sending me a new cradle! It was a very postive experience. I was definitely impressed with Garmin's Customer Service!
I love this product!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 15, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I bought this about a month ago and currently have 10 runs with it, including a few 5 milers. I'm not a top of the line runner but I am very interested in making myself a better runner through the information gathered with this device. I have great things to say about this product. It's very comfortable to wear, light on the wrist and the heart rate monitor is hardly noticable. Even my wife will wear this - and she is not into wearing any devices when she works out. I have to think that if I was to wear this for 26 miles though, it might become a little irritating, but then what wouldn't be irritating after 26 miles? The best part is that I don't even have to think about logging my activity. It's very easy to get the data from the device and the information that you get is incredible! If you are looking for a toy to help you train, this is it!
Outstanding! Delivers on all promises
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Jul 28, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Ok, my only regret with my purchase of the 305 is that I waited 2 months to purchase it because of the initial bad reviews. I had a 201 and loved it until I accidentally left it in my workout clothes and it got washed. It survived the washer but I think what did it in was banging around in the dryer. I trained/ran 2 marathons w/ the 201 and loved it. The 305 has been an awesome upgrade. I also bought the cadence for my bike and now I have all the info I could ever need. Having all this info has really re-energized my workouts and am now trying for my first Ironman. I have in two weeks put in 200 miles on the bike and 35 in running and have no complaints. It does acquire satellites faster, gets a stronger reception in tree cover, and connects with the computer far easier than the 201. My only issue is that I had to improvise my own bike mount but hope Garmin will be coming out with one soon. Also I wish it was waterproof enough to take swimming.
Great training tool
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 21, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great training tool for almost all levels of runners. Beginners probably want to make sure they will be sticking with the sport before investing the money in this. But once you have been bitten by the "running bug" this will add a new, fun dimension to your workouts. The features all work excellently. I have had no problems with any aspect of the unit.
great item but..........
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 23, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
great item works like a charm and really hepful for training for any sports occasion , my only problem was that irish customs charged me an extra 35 euro for getting it so that bumped up the price still it is well worth it for any serious athlete in training
A satisfied Mac user
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 23, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This is a great product. It works as advertised. I am a Mac head and the software works well with OS X.
Forerunner 305 is great
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 23, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I bought my forerunner 305 to get in shape for an up coming 5k run. I am not a runner by any means. This is my first 5k. I am now running 4 miles and this GPS shows me exactly where I've been, how fast a ran, average speed, distance, and Max and average heart rate. I could actually see my heart rate improve along with speed and distance. My best friend is going to try the full marathon and loves his also. Just put in on the cradle when your done and it downloads all the information automatically and shows you everything. IT'S GREAT!!!! I highly recommend it for all runners, walkers, and bicyclists.
B. King Florida
Excellent product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 21, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 is a fantastic product for runners, cyclist or any persons that like to know where he's at in his training. The heartbeat monitor is a bit finicky at rest but when doing the physical activity it works no problem. The type is a bit small on the display, apart from the time elapsed which is easy to see, but I mostly use the rest of the information in the provided software by downloading from the device. The graphic of speed, distance vs heartbeat help you see the progress you are making while training on a regular basis.
Thanks
John Brodeur
Garmin 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Excellent tool for both running and biking. GPS reciever gets signal under trees (unlike prior models) and the computer interface is awesome. The price was good too. I had this for only 2 months so don't know if customer service is good or not.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This product is well worth the money!! I made the mistake of buying the 301 first since I was new to running and wasn't sure if I would get bored with it after a few months. I used the 301 for approximately 8 months and quickly grew tired of the device losing the GPS signal and my heart rate. So, I decided to spend the extra money on the 305 (since many of my friends raved about it). Now I wish I had bought the 305 in the first place--I never lose the GPS signal. Also, the device is great for reading my heart rate. The only problem is that I am small framed and the heart rate monitor is rather loose on me. So, if you are contemplating between the two--it is definitely worth the extra money for the 305.
Excellent training tool
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Have had this for about a year. Also have the cadence unit for the bike, and just added the foot pod. The device has worked perfectly for me, and with the latest updates my biggest gripe, that it took a long time to find the satellites when turned on, has been mostly resolved. My only remaining complaint is that its a bit bulky, but I think that can't be helped for now. I expect future iterations of this device will continue to shrink. Highly recommend.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Great training tool. I was afraid that the GPS might not be very accurate but it was pretty consistent and picked up satellites, even in areas I thought were fairly remote. I have only been running for 1 year and so I am not very good at knowing intuitively what my pace is so this has been especially helpful for me on my interval runs. Worth the money for anyone who is trying to follow a training schedule (ie., first time Marathoner).
Garmin Forerunner 305 - Speed and Distance Monitor & Heart Rate Monitor
excellent running tool
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I've had the Garmin forerunner for about a month now and it has been a great running tool for me. I have yet to have problems with reception; even running through the woods it has worked flawlessly. I've had no problems with the heart monitor, either. It's also a great motivational tool, allowing you to see tangible results. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys running but is sometimes in need of a little motivaton. (It also has bike functionality, but I haven't tried it yet.)
Love it, love it, love it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I am training for my first marathon and the Garmin 305 was recommended by my coach. I can't believe the difference it's made! Since purchasing, I've been able to shave 2mins/mile off my best time and can manage my endurance much easier. It tracks everything (even multiple sports) so there is no guessing, only takes a few minutes to locate satellites, and I've had no problems running in wooded areas.
Great for long distance training
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I used the forerunner 305 to train for my first half marathon which I completed in 1:59:00 so I was pretty pleased. It was great to get out and run without premeasuring distances etc. The forerunner keeps track for you. I've uploaded several training runs to the MotionBased website. I'm very glad I bought this.
great product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I'm very happy with the Garmin Forerunner 305. I've had no problem with the GPS dropping out in MA or NH. Customer service was very responsive too when I asked about a software error message that simply meant that a timeout occurred (which happened because the unit wasn't plugged in.) I use it whenever I run now.
Garmin 305 - Outstanding device
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
If you are serious about training and conditioning, this is a must have device. Don't guess at distance, heart rate and activity levels and hope to get positive results. With the Garmin 305 you can track your exercise progress and accurately measure your activity by downloading to your PC or to the Motion Based website. The Garmin 305 is great technology providing real results.
Excellent for training
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This product is excellent. The GPS signal has always been good and even finds the satellites before I go outside (this is important in the cold MN winters). I have been told that earlier Garmin units did lose the signal occasionally. I used this unit during a very cloudy rainy Sunday run with no loss of signal.
This is primarily a training device. I use the heart rate monitor every time that I run. It has worked flawlessly. I just put it on and run. The instructions mention use of a gel to ensure good contact, but I never found it necessary. It probably depends upon your body shape. It did not work on my 9 year old, but I guess that I did not expect it to. It has helped me to control my speed and not overdo it.
Workouts are easy to create in the training software and upload them to the device. I tried out an interval workout and enjoyed not having to do it on a track. It was a little difficult to know how I was doing because the display just lets you know if you are in a certain zone. However, I modified the zones to be focused on the paces that I normally run and it works.
In general, I think that this product will help me to train. However, I have only had the product for 1 month. I am sure that I will have more constructive criticism after using the unit a bit longer. The only thing I would like to see on the training software is the ability to control the scale. I had some problems with the pace scale being too high if you have to stop any time during the run the scale will be off and you cannot change it. However, despite these minor issues, I am completely satisfied.
Garmon 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The 305 version seems more sensitive to satellite signals and tracks your position running on trails and among trees. The computer software is very user friendly and does everything automatically after you make the connection.
Garmin 305 - fantastic running aid
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I had used the Garmin 205 for about 3 years and was quite satisfied with it. However, the 305 is a quantum leap in technology and versatility. The additional screens, smaller "footprint", and improved satellite reception are impressive. Also like the fact that it fits like a regular watch. Only downside is the shorter battery time, but that isn't a big problem.
Every runner who runs off road, travels, or just doesn't want to have to drive their car over their running routes should own one.
garmin forerunner 305 wrist gps
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 was a great asset in running the NYC Marathon. My time was better because I was able to stay on pace.
Practical, Useful, and All-Around Great Buy
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The first thing you notice about a Forerunner 305 is the size. It seems a little bulky, and people remark about how you must be able to watch video on it. You get used to it, though, and it is anything but detrimental. The large screen allows for you to easily read all of the data on the screen. It isn't heavy, and it's almost possible to forget it's there.
Other key features of the 305 include the high-quality paired heart rate monitor. It doesn't get tangled with other signals when training in a group, and configures itself right out of the box. Both the Forerunner and the heart rate monitor have great battery life. The Garmin is advertised as having an eight hour battery life under normal use, and in my use, it's pretty close. I've never used it for eight hours straight, because I'm not an Ironman, but I have used it on 4-6 hour bike rides, and then a couple of hours the next day without recharging.
Without too much trouble, the weight-mounted watch will mount onto a bike handlebar. It's not intuitive, but it works. The watch is also well designed to include a biking mode [press and hold 'Mode', and select 'Biking']. Overall, the Garmin Forerunner is an irreplaceable tool for those meticulous data-collectors. Even better, the fact that you have it will make you want to run, because you get to use a Garmin.
written
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
This has been an excellent tool to keep up with all training. I am very happy with forerunner 305. At setup, Garmin Tech support was a delight to deal with, and after 4 weeks of use, a glitch in the "training center" was easily corrected by calling the support line again.
As far as the amazon experiece; i am a satisfied customer. reliability and delivery was there per expectations. I recommend the garmin unit to the serious athlete who wants to chart/log/review acomplishments.
Awesome
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
Love it. Works exactly as expected. [...] is a great training log site, but unfortunately you cannot upload any sessions where you had the GPS turned off (i.e. inside treadmills, spin classes, etc). Fortunately, you can still review this in the Garmin Training Center, but you lose a lot of the granularity you get on motionbased.com. Motionbased is working on supporting these non-GPS'd sessions, but no ETA last I checked.
Easy setup, Lots of features
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I found this product to be easy to set up, and chock full of features. You can view your running path as a map, or in 3D. And it keepe trackof all your changes in pace, calories. Very customizable, can even change your pace ranges. Very helpful tool!
Garmin 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 22, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
A very nice product, easy and fun to use- a good traing partner with very little of own preparations befor using it. Even though the product is bougt in the US it was very little adoption needed to get it work in Sweden (only a little plug for the charging unit). Best of all was the GUI for the PC which gives you a nice overview and data from your exercises/training.
My Garmin will be very useful for my training planning and future ability to perform well.
Great Product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Mar 30, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Excellent product. It really helps keep me interested in my workout. Watching the progress is great. The unit seems to track very well most of the time. It sometimes has trouble for a couple of seconds when I'm under a heavy canopy of trees, but it doesn't ever completely loose the signal. Overall I love it and would highly recommend it.
luv it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 24, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Love my Garmin 305 fitness computer! It helps give me a basis on my heart rate as well as my mileage and pace. I run for fun and for sport and it fits easily into both worlds. I thought it would be difficult to use but it is real easy stepup. I do have a small wrist and I was worried about such a big face watch but the large numbers work great for eyes that need reading glasses and I did as a sweat wrist band and place my watch over to keep it from rubbing on a very promient wrist bone that I have. My problem not an issue for most people even regular watches bother it.
Back to the watch, easy to download. I haven't worked yet with some of the freetrail optional software yet. Ijust wanted to figure everything out the regular way first. I am not an electronic geek so I was somewhat afraid it would be too difficult to setup and download. If I can do, I know you can so give it a try. The best buy was from Amazon.com. Believe me I checked out the rest before buying. They did raise the price while I was looking not fair but they still were lower price even with the price increase.
Great training tool!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 20, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I recently purchased the Garmin Forerunner 305 to better prepare for a 10K that I am training for this spring. First and foremost, this is so EASY to use. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how to use this fitness computer to get the training information that you need. Also, it doesn't take long for it to find and lock-in a signal. Since I have been using this, I have seen an improvment in my running times and speed. There are just so many cool things you can do it. I could just go on and on. If you want to take your training to the next level, this is the thing for you.
Exellent, free to run everywhere
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 17, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
You can run, bicykle, skiing, walk - an anything else. You can go home and see it all on your computer - transmit it to google maps. You don't have to thing on a special route - you just run.....
fabulous
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 15, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Yeah, I read the reviews before buying and was getting a bit worried. I had the previous version of this product and had no problems with it. This one is no different, very reliable, and more compact. The heart rate monitor and cycling features are a great addition. Yes, it takes a few minutes to acquire sattelites each time you turn it on, but once that is complete it stays on track everywhere. I had no problems setting up the watch or the computer software and it has worked well with each and every use. To me, another excellent GARMIN product.
Excellent Product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Not much to add that others haven't already said. This is an excellent product that will (hopefully) inform my running for years to come. Works right out of the box, gives tons of valuable info, and is rock solid.
The item and service were superlative. The Garmin Rocks!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I love the Garmin ForeRunner 305. I have one for myself and purchased this one for my office manager so she could track her progress. It is a state of the art easy to use training guide. I love checking workouts on the computer. And the interval count down is a great feature. I believe it has enhanced my training and helped me to improve my time. The only thing I would like is if it were smaller and lighter. It is cumbersome.
From a cyclist - fantastic device!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I've had my Forerunner 305 for over a year now and it continues to perform brilliantly! I bought it to replace a Ciclosport HAC4 HRM/Computer. The HAC4's transmitters were weak, so I couldn't hook the speed sensor to the back wheel to monitor my speed on an indoor trainer. The 305's sensors are great. It picks up my rear wheel no problem, so I can monitor my speed and distance even when I'm not on the road. The chest transmitter works great. I also bought the wireless cadence kit (GSC 10), which also works great. Luckily, I read the reviews and discovered that the battery that ships with the cadence sensor is no good, so I bought some CR2032 batteries beforehand. I tried to link the cadence sensor to the 305 using the included battery - no good. I changed out the battery to a new one and presto, instant pairing! I love the GPS and the virtual partner - I can track improvements, and know where I stand on some days when I feel like I'm struggling. I also love that I can use the Forerunner 305 for other sports - jogging and snowboarding! I highly recommend this product. I haven't had any problems with it so I don't know how Garmin's support is - which speaks for the quality of the product. One small detail I would have liked is a mini-usb port on the watch as opposed to the base, but I think this wold have made the watch less water-resistant. I much prefer the water resistance.
running with ease
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 11, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This watch has been such a help in my running. By tracking mileage and pace with ease, it helps with training. Being able to get off the main roads with the nasty fumes is a plus. It is a little large but easy to read features. It charges like a cell phone and hooks up easily to the computer. The GPS hasn't failed me yet!
excellent tool for runners
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 11, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I started running about six months ago. I bought this "watch" for my first half-marathon. It was an excellent tool. It gives you all information you need to control your run. After you're done with your run and sync all the info into your computer, you can analayse everything that happened during the run. I recommend it with no doubt.
No Problems / Best Investment
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 11, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I love this product the garmin forerunner 305 is great it has really helped me pick up my running. I have had no problems with it what so ever.
EXCELLENT!!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 9, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Forerunner is packed with info derived by the GPS. Your speed, elevation, incline, etc. Very pleased witht the item.
Great Gadget!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 9, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is the first watch like this I have owned and it is great. I read all the reviews before I bought it. Yes, it is a little big, but it has to be a little bigger than normal to fit all the cool stuff into it. I have had no problems getting a satellite signal, but I only run in my neighborhood and there are few trees. It takes a little time to learn how everything works, but it is very easy to use after you learn how it works. The computer downloads couldn't be any easier. I checked prices everywhere and Amazon's was by far the best, plus no sales tax and free shipping. I would recommend the Forerunner 305 to anyone.
Garmin Forerunner 305
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 8, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My only regret is that I didn't buy it earlier!! WOW-great features and very user friendly!
Terrific training tool!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Feb 8, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The Forerunner 305 is a fantastic tool for training in multiple disciplines. It is well built and reliable. I'm very happy with it. In fact, my wife and two friends bought Garmin Forerunners as well.
This is perfect for outdoor runs!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This is the perfect "watch" for my outdoor runs, hikes, etc. With my polar, I had no idea how fast I was going.
br /
br /Pros: able to tell speed, distance, calorie count, heart rate, elevation, time of day, laps, heading, sunrise and sunset, map and on and on.
br /USB linked to PC. User friendly software. Can also use with motionbased for even more training options. Locates satellites quickly and keeps the connection... even under trees!
br /
br /Cons: Truly, there are only two I can think of and that is the charge only lasts for 10 hrs. So, you can't really use this as a watch. Oh, and it didn't come with a wall jack charger, only the USB charger, so if you're traveling you need to remember to BRING the charger to hook it up to your laptop. The second is you won't get a calorie count if your not moving/ traveling, even though your HR is still monitored. So you can't use it for cardio classes or the treadmill.
br /
A Must-Have for a Runner!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 19, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
This was the best investment I made for my marathon training! It tells you the distance, pace, and time during your run. It will also give you your best/worse pace, average pace, and calories burned. I haven't even begun to go into all that it does - that is just what I use. If you are going to run on the street, this takes away all the guess-work so that you can enjoy your run. Despite the size, after your first couple of runs you do not even notice it is there. I played around with the fit, and now find it very comfortable. I love it and recommend it to anyone that wants to run outside!
Slow runner
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 18, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I waited to get one of these training devices due to high price and concerns that the data would not be reliable.
br /
br /I can say after using the 305 that the data is very reliable and the price drop makes this an incredibly valuable training tool for the following reasons:
br /
br /1) Removes the subjective evaluation of running--today "felt great" is no longer useful--the bpm tells the story. Even a slow run can be a great workout on an objective bpm basis.
br /
br /2) The data collection is seemless--you don't notice wearing the watch although it is rather large.
br /
br /3) Motivation--knowing exactly where you are at both w/bpm and pace allows you to slow down even if you feel you subjectively think you are going slow, but also pushes you if you aren't cutting it.
br /
br /4) Historical record--imagine having your PR in a marathon recorded on this thing, or even better several months of the build up to such a PR, I wish I had the record of that but hopefully will in the future.
br /
br /Possible downsides:
br /
br /1) I don't know how long the device will last.
br /
br /2) GPS coverage may vary over time/location--so far it has acquired the satellites quickly.
br /
br /In total this an outstanding training tool that can help any runner. I think the negative reviews may be due to either (1) a bad device, or (2) olympic caliber athletes that need greater moment by moment precision. I haven't had any problems w/the 305.
Great Product...
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 16, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have used other GPS / Heart rate products in the past (Body Link) and this one rocks! The data received via the motion base site is very in-depth and Garmin is good about keeping pace with up dates. The system works flawlessly on an Apple too. The only problem I have had is syncing with satellites in the city, my work around is to wear the watch while walking to the gym and let it sync. Then when I'm ready to run the watch is ready. I can't wait to try the cycling features this summer.... Also love the way it fits on my wrist, very comfortable and easy to read. Anthe the ability to set the screens to the data you want to see it a great idea...
Excellent Product
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 14, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Garmin Forerunner 305 GPS Receiver With Heart Rate MonitorI have owned the 305 for a year and I use it only occasionally. The battery life is excellent and the satellite acquisition time is also very good. It is accurate and dependable. The only drawback is the software that came with it to use the history etc. on a computer. It worked at first but now shows and error and will not start. I don't really need the software so it is only a small inconvenience for me.
don't run from home without it
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
great gadget. only thing i've seen annoying about it was having to remain completely still in order to get picked up by the satellites sometimes. o and there's no back light or i haven't found it yet so you can't see the display when running at night. great for monitoring your training and pushing yourself harder. barely feel it on my arm while running.
Great Garmin!!!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 20, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
First time I used my Forerunner 305(hours outta the box), I achieved a PR running a 4 miler by 3:30!!! Great training partner. Can't wait til the Philadelphia Marathon!!!
well pleased
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 3.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 6, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Really find the Garmin 305 to be a motivating tool. It is exciting to log my runs and see my progress each week. Seems accurate enough to me and I am well pleased!
Garmin's policy on product life is a joke
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 2.8 out of 10
Created: Oct 2, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I've been a 305 user for the last 3 years. 2 friends of mine and myself bought 3 devices to use them in our Marathon training programs. Another friend of mine had already bought the 205 model (the same as the 305, but w/o the heart rate monitor). Now, after 3 years of use, all 4 are not working AT ALL, because of dead batteries. The joke is that you cannot replace them. When they die, you simply throw your 305 to the garbage. Furthermore, during these 3 years, one always had problems with long races, ultras or trail marathons that would last over 7-8 hours. As I read, Garmin is still using the same philosophy for other similar products, like the Garmin Edge 305HR (bike) or the new 405.
br /
br /It's a pitty that such an anti-ecological policy prevails, for a product that, otherwise, is very good for outdoor sports, running, biking even skiing (but not triathlon). I hope that Garmin changes policy, cause until then they have lost 4 customers.
Like a timex, takes a lickin and keeps on ticken
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 2.6 out of 10
Created: Oct 13, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I use this thing for everything, mountainbikeing , hiking, even took it on a enduro motorcycle ride. I have hit the ground with it numorous times. I love my Garmin
waste of my money
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Aug 16, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Mine was a birthday present from my wife and I was thrilled - just what i wanted to help me train for this falls duathlon and long distance running calendarand when it works it is a very good tool
Unfortunately the device has a myriad of software/harware problems. I had no problems with the GPS or HRM unlike many others but the device often locked up mid event and often recorded data in the wrong segment despite my careful setting. It placed items in multi sports which cannot later be transferred to the right sport in the PC program.
I can normally reset it by the cold restart or letting the battery run down and then recharging in the cradle. Several times downloading software updates seemed to kick it back into life but not this morning - It is completely unresponsive and I am just about just about to go out on a long run. If this were a car I would have given up a long time ago - it's the Yugo of the sports watch world. The garmin 305 forum on Motion Based Agents webbsite is full of tales of woe about this device and the lack of customer support although in fairness this is anecdotal as I have not called about this problem yet. I think I am beyond the warranty period so I'll just have to put it down to bad ( and a very expensive) experience. My sister in law teased me about this device gfrom the word go - she is a polar fan and I have to say the software is much much better and so is the relaibility of the device. Caveat Emptor
Great device, but locks up all the time
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Mar 4, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought it about two months ago. Used it to run, ski, drive, works great. Works great under canopy, too.
Two major problems:
First, this week-end, it started to lock up. Just doesn't turn on anymore. The manual doesn't tell you how to get out of that, and the garmin web page has information for the older model only. You have to hold down the reset/lap button and the mode button to get your unit back. Then upgrade the software, but mine already has the latest...
Second, Training Center is limited. Just get SportTracks, and never use Garmin Training Center again.
Good product, worst possible software!
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 22, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
The only reason to buy this product is if you have a hear condition and need to carefully monitor your heart rate. The software makes no use of the data at all. For example, the way calories are calculated, it says you burn more on a miles long cost down a mountain than you'll burn working hard on the way up.
br /
br /It only uses SPEED to calculate effort! How silly is that? Buy the cheaper unit and you'll be happier. If you really want to measure your efforts forget the value of the GPS and get something like a Timex or Polar. They use the heart stress measurements correctly.
Garmin Forerunner 305 Highly Innacurate Mapping Software
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I tried uploading some of my routes to one of the mapping software websites and got terrible mapping results. Some parts of the route were off by over 1/4 mile. Their routing of the GPS coordinates were nowhere near the roads that I actually ran on. Has anyone else experienced this bad of a result with their mapping of their routes?
Works as a GPS
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 29, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
The GPS works great, however I cannot get the heart monitor to work reliably. It works one day then not the next. Way to much money for just a GPS
Great toy, not a training tool
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Oct 5, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I have used the ForeRunner 305 for alomst two years. While I have not had the nightmares that other people have had (such as complete unit failure), I have had some very aggravating issues. These are:
br /
br /1) Incredibly long satellite aquisition time. Sometimes this is twenty minutes or more! Very annoying.
br /2) Totally unreliable data for calories and altitude. I ran on a beach, right at the water's edge, where I was certainly at sea level for the entire run. I even started and stopped in the same place. The data came back saying that I had gained 650 ft. of altitude. This murders the calorie data as it adds energy to get you up the hill that does not exist. Why generate data for training if it is worthless? Basically, it makes the unit worthless for its primary function.
br /3) Garmin training center is terrible and inflexible.
br /4) Pace and speed fluctuate unrealistically across the run.
br /
br /I do not want to be completely negative, because there are some nice things. The watch and heart monitor are comfortable. It is neat to be able to export to Google Earth and see where you have gone. The distance measurements seem to be relatively accurate.
br /
br /All in all, a great toy but not a training tool at all!
Must Have for performance running
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
i found this product great. Some reviewers think the process of linking with satellites long but i found it normal.
I have the Timex Bodylink with the GPS unit and it's no match for the Forerunner 305. The Garmin is a single piece as the timex has at least one extra and disconfortable piece to attach to your arm or running shorts.
Ok some may say the Garmim is a huge piece indeed it is but its light and I do not want to use it for anything else than running or biking so it's fine for me. It's much more accurate than the timex and it don't lose the signal as timex frequently does (at least mine does).
The heart rate monitor is also more accurate and also don't lose it's signal as the timex.
Another points I think are worth mentioning are the rechargeable battteries and the software this last one i found so great cause you see your workouts so easely in data mode or on graphics this feature really pleased me. Once again some may say the timex already has the software but to use it you have to buy another piece to put in your shorts I didn't even wanted to try this one I like to run light...
As everything the Forerunner is not perfect (but it's close to that) and there are 2 negative points that I think are worth mentioning:
The size (it's too big)
it's not waterproof as his rival the bodylink is.
Hope this review helps other athletes to decided which one is better.
GARMIN GPS TRAINER
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I like all of the features. The heart rate block should be a little larger it's a little hard to see.
love it, worth getting to know the tech manual
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 2.4 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
If you don't like learning tech stuff, it's pretty plug and go to use the basic features. However, it does so many cool things that it is worth spending the time to read the manual to be able to use all the features.
EXCELLENT!!!
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 2.2 out of 10
Created: Aug 2, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I just started to train for the Walt Disney World Goofy Challenage (Half Marathon Saturday and Full Marathon Sunday). A friend of mine purchased the Nike+ and he liked it but I did not want to have to go out and purchase new shoes, an iPod Nano, and the Nike+ items which would have cost me in the 400 buck range. But I wanted to have something. So I figured let me get this. There were mixed reviews about signal and such that I was a bit concerned about. I made sure I could return the product if I had problems and went ahead an ordered it. To this date I have had any problems with my watch and do not run without it. I have only had it for 3 weeks and one 12 runs and love it. I would recommend using MotionBase also with it to get more detail on the run. The onlything I would say is the Training Center should have more detailed maps. If you are looking to invest in soemthing like this go ahead and purchase this one. You will not be disappointed.
Great Concept--Poor Quality
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 2.0 out of 10
Created: Aug 20, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I bought the FR305 to replace an old FR301 that finally gave out after almost 2 years. The concept behind the 305 is great, but it just doesn't hold up in terms of quality. I had to send mine back because the altitude function didn't work. The elevation profiles for my workouts looked like I was jumping on a trampelline.
BEWARE!!!!!
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 2.0 out of 10
Created: Oct 6, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I was loving the features of this running watch for 4 months before it stopped working altogether. I have had several issues with Garmin. Their Nuvi only last for 8 months before it stopped working. Customer service is slow and repairs are expensive. I would check other products that are better manufactured and have better customer service.
Why is the BPM the smallest font on the display?
Rating: 3 out of 5
Weight: 2.0 out of 10
Created: Dec 10, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
I bought this monitor at Costco because it was on sale. The reason why I bought a heart rate monitor was to monitor my heart rate. However, the font size is so small, I have to stop exercising to read it (look at the image photo above; it is located in the upper-right corner, above the largest numerical display/timer. That blur in the corner is the BPM area). BPM is also difficult to read in certain lighting conditions, mostly due to glare. Another drawback is that the chest strap is a little loose, even though it's adjusted to the shortest possible length. It would slip if I didn't place it directly underneath the elastic band of my spots bra. It does not satisfy what I need, but it does have a lot of extra options and bonuses--customizing and various data integration (GPS, data sharing w/computer, etc.).
This is a question, more than a review
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 1.8 out of 10
Created: Dec 21, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
What's exactly the prop65 from the Estate of California, actually I've got a little bit scare because of it.
br /
br /If anyone knows more of this I'll really would like to hear from it.
br /
br /Thanks a lot!
br /
br /WC
great!
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 1.8 out of 10
Created: Oct 6, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
Thank u I both this watches like a gift 4 my father, he rally likes it. It was fas. Thank u.
My best GPS running device ever!
Rating: 4 out of 5
Weight: 1.4 out of 10
Created: Aug 4, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
This is the best GPS running device I have ever owned.
It took some time to find the satellites the first time, but now it usually takes about 1 min.
I haven't experienced a single satellite los yet.
The Training Center could need some development thou!
Info at my fingertips
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 1.4 out of 10
Created: Aug 28, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I love this product - I run outside at least 3 times a week and really love the fact that I can know everything about my run during my run! This is an awesome product!
A lackluster Performance from a Top Player
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 1.3 out of 10
Created: May 10, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
The Garmin Forerunner 305 is a very poor performing product. It is the fourth Garmin hardware product I have owned (in addition to a number of Mapsource products) and unfortunately it is by far the worst. The unit fails to perform most of its functions even marginally well. In principal the idea of GPS enabled workout analysis with combined heart rate monitoring is great. You would know exactly how far you have gone, how fast, over what terrain and at what level of exertion. This is what the Forerunner 305 promises but fails to deliver.
The much hyped Sirf chip is very poor at locking in on satellites. Even after several minutes, it is most frequently unable to lock on more than three satellites. Telemetry is erratic and inaccurate. Sitting in a park where I exercise, it showed I walked well over a mile while I was actually sitting and talking. The next day it did the same thing on another long walk. If you pause in an area of marginal satellite coverage the unit interprets the erratic readings it receives as movement. After I downloaded my data to my laptop, it told me that at times I was "walking" 27-35 MPH. While the included Training Center software is not bad, its limitations prevent you from cleaning up the poor quality data that is downloaded from the unit. At best, you end up with a vague impression of your work out, not a clear picture.
As others have said, the unit's performance is improved by waiting to start moving until the acquiring satellites screen goes away, but I still don't feel this unit is ready for prime time. I have compared the aquisition time of the 305 to my GPS 76Csx and the 305 takes triple the time of the other unit to lock on. This is true even in the midwest in ideal conditions. Overall, the 305 is balky and non-intuitive at best, and at worst wholly inaccurate and misleading. At this price point, Garmin should be providing a well thought out and executed product that rivals its more traditional units
Not worth the money!
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 1.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 12, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
After the first charge, the battery would not charge again.
br /The USB link to the watch did not work.
br /The problem may be the cradle.
br /I am not sure I would want to spend that much money for something that acts up the first day of use.
br /
Horrible Customer E-Mail Support
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 1.2 out of 10
Created: Dec 27, 2007
Thanks for your feedback
I gave a 2-star rating only because of Garmin's customer support! The wrist unit itself work's very well and I am very impressed with the ability of the Forerunner 305 to receive satellite signal's,even on heavy overcast day's! However,I am experiencing,what I believe,is a simple problem with Garmin's "Training Center" PC software that is included with the Forerunner 305. After I had made NUMEROUS attempt's to E-mail my question to Garmin Customer Support,I have come to the conclusion that Garmin does not want to be bothered with their customer's technical question's! So,in conclusion,when my GPS unit eventually become's inoperable,I will not bother Garmin with anymore of my money!
Best Yet -Buy reputably-No problems
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 1.2 out of 10
Created: Jul 27, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Maybe its mainly the moaners who review these products. Mine is superb. Thought there was a fault. Rang UK supplier. Software suggestions from him. Rang Garmin (UK) - Solved in seconds. Cant tell from the moaners but I wonder if they are UK or USA.
I haven't got a complaint. It is marvellous and improved my solitary training no end.
Anyone want to buy mine?
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 1.1 out of 10
Created: May 18, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
In the month that I have owed the FR 305 I have taken to leaving it at home because it is so hard to get a signal; I don't even consider it on a cloudy day! This morning, under a cloudless sky with minimal trees (108th in Riverside Park in New York City), I stood there for 10 minutes while it was trying to locate a signal only to be rewarded with the unit asking if I was in doors. Giving up I turned it off and on (so it would look again) and then ran three miles south along the Hudson River - about as "big sky" as you are going to get in New York City. Same question.
The one time I got it to work, in Central Park of all places, it seemed to work fine though the "pace" on two different screens did not agree with each other. Since the unit is collecting dust in my drawer, I have not spent the time trying to figure out if they are telling me two different things. No comment on the HR monitor for the same reason, I never use the thing.
I am no scientist but it does seem like Garmin is asking for trouble by putting contacts for the recharger underneath the unit where it will spend a good portion of its life on a sweaty wrist. Isn't warm, salt, moisture, and metal a recipe for corrosion?
Too bad, I had high hopes for this unit. I'll try again a couple more times but suspect will soon give up as it is very distracting constantly looking at my watch to see if it is working. Seems to me I should drop this all together, map out my distances with Google Earth and just use a $5 stopwatch! Anyone want to but an almost new FR 305??
Garmin Fiorerunner 305 GPS with Heart Rate Monitor
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 0.6 out of 10
Created: Nov 14, 2008
Thanks for your feedback
My Garmin 305 GPS Heart Rate Monitor wrist watch is the greatest! I enjoy using it as I am a marathoner.
poor gps function - updated review
Rating: 2 out of 5
Weight: 0.2 out of 10
Created: Apr 27, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
i was kind of surprised at the other reviews because my experience with the gps function has not been very good. the unit takes forever to lock up and when placed side by side with my etrex for comparison it requires three to five times longer to lock up. this morning on a bike ride after three minutes of standing in one place i just gave up and at no time during the one hour ride did the unit ever lock up. my experience so far is the gps receiver is slow and not very sensitive. if garmin ever gets around to using the sirf chipset perhaps this will be a better product. in the meantime i am going back to my casio setup that locks quickly and consistently. also the battery cannot make it through a full day so if you are planning to use this for hiking it is not a good choice.
i am updating this review because it looks like there is some kind of firmware problem i have run into. initially i did not have a clear sky view and the unit never locked. still on i moved it to a clear area and after leaving the unit on for an hour with a clear view of the sky it never locked. when i turned it off and then on it almost immediately locked. it appears that if the unit does not lock right away it will never lock. my work around has been to shut it off and then on again and it seems to lock up the 2nd time fairly quickly. so it does not appear to be a major sensitivity problem as i first thought.
for some reason i cannot change the number of stars, but now i know the little glitch it has i would actually give it three to four stars.
ForeWARNing!
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 0.0 out of 10
Created: Sep 26, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I purchased a Garmin Forerunner 305 about two months ago, and while I really liked the idea of having the GPS and HRM and tracking data, my experience with Garmin and this particular product has not been good.
When I first got it, I followed the instructions, got it plugged in and went out for my first ride with it. When I got home and plugged it in to my computer USB bus, the computer froze and required a reset to reboot. Once the computer came up again, the USB bus didn't work. I realized that the likely problem was too much current draw on the USB bus, and was going to need to get a new motherboard :( Darned disappointing, but being a computer and electronics person, I went and purchased the new motherboard and a powered external USB hub and about 12 hours later I was up and running again.
So, this time I plugged the Garmin Forerunner 305 into the powered USB hub instead of the computer. As soon as I did this, my computer blue screened (crashed) and it did so nearly every time I plugged the Garmin in. At this point I decided it must have been a problem with the Garmin Forerunner and got on their support system. Here is where the real problems happened.
Their support person told me:
1. Check for chipset names that are INTEL, NEC, etc. These are compatible chipsets with our devices.
2. If you have a chipset name that contains SiS, Via, OpenHCD, Ali, or Alr,
these chipsets are not compatible with our devices and may not allow the USB Card Programmer to function.
That wasn't on the package, or in the instructions, but regardless I learned that I had a compatible chipset from the manufacturer. So after letting them know that and that I now expected some compensation for my loss and that something definitely caused my motherboard's USB bus to go bad they asked that I send the unit, cable, charger, etc back to them so they could determine what might have caused the problem, which I did. After a week or so I asked if anything had been determined about what had happened but they didn't have any answers. I told them at this point that I expected some compensation for my damaged motherboard - another unit maybe? Something. They offered to send me a new unit and a cadence unit (for my bike) but I indicated that I already purchased the $60.00 cadence unit and that it didn't work on my bicycle due to the frame/pedal design and that a new unit would help since I really wanted to start using the new toy I bought.
After getting the replacement unit which didn't cause any blue screens (after about a week) and seems to be functioning as well as the rest of them, Garmin refused to compensate me for my motherboard - I offered to accept the unit that I sent in back as payment - Garmin's response:
"Unfortunately, it appears as if we are unable to determine why the failure occurred given the information you provided. Thus we question whether the Forerunner 305 had anything to do with the failure on your PC. The device you provided does meet all specification standards. I apologize we could not provide a more conclusive answer.".
Unfortunately, I had already sent the bad Forerunner 305 back to Garmin along with the crash dump files from my PC and offered to send them the motherboard several times as well - they were never interested in what brand/make/model of motherboard I had - so I was no longer able to determine if a component had failed in the charging circuit of the Garmin and was out of luck.
And that has been my experience with Garmin. Great idea, but a bad company. There are a lot of problems with Garmin's products, unlike many better manufacturers like Canon and Apple computer, they don't deal with the problems in an equitable manner.
Be ForeWARNED!
Complete piece of s#*t - don't waste your money
Rating: 1 out of 5
Weight: 0.0 out of 10
Created: May 23, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Great design, poor execution. When it works, it is quite fun and informative. When it works... Problems: won't locate satelites in under 15 minutes (and this is standing still... good luck if you move a footstep, as you'll wait all day); unreliable battery (my unit turns itself on, draining battery, which is also a problem to charge); spotty results on autopause (set for -10kph on bike mode, leading to it pausing anytime between 2 and 20kph); unreliable contacts (the gold contacts corrode easily); bad bad BAD firmware (space isn't enough to discuss).
Recommendations: buy anything else or rue the day you dropped nearly 400USD on this piece of electronic roadkill.
Horse Endurance Race
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 0.0 out of 10
Created: Aug 30, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
Bought Garmin Forerunner 305 a month a go , Totally Satisfied .
I did Modify/Extend the built to fit my horse as i am preparing him for Endurance Race .
The tool is working perfectly i can monitor my horse status during the daily taring , now i can till when to push him more and when to take it easy on him .
Using the software i can keep track of my horse workout and see the improvement .
The tools is a must for every endurance rider since the heart rate is a big factor in the endurance race .
Mohammad M Kaj
[...]
Best for beginners
Rating: 5 out of 5
Weight: 0.0 out of 10
Created: May 1, 2006
Thanks for your feedback
I really don't understand the poor reviews, this is a watch sized GPS with better performance than units ten times its size. It is a thousand times better than ANY pedometer out there. You don't need to calibrate it like the Polar units that don't provide near as much data and cost just as much. and it has a built in Heart rate monitor that works great. If you want perfection you can wait forever. If you want the best right now get a 305....
